H53 - Hatton Park - Brownley Green Lane

Object

Representation ID: 70076

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: David Neil Williams

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Access to the proposed development will have a detrimental effect on the viability of the village hall. It is understood that to provide access to the site then large swathes of the car park will be removed. This action will result in loss of usage. Car park needs to be adjacent so that it is convenient for elderly, parents with babies and the disabled

Object

Representation ID: 70102

Received: 14/04/2016

Respondent: G R Knibb

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to allocation: -
- lack of consultation with residents
- WDC did not seek alternative sites
- green belt boundaries should only be altered under exceptional circumstances
- allocation of sites at Hampton Magna and Hatton Park in excess of what is required
- WDC did not consider Bubbenhall as a growth village close to Coventry, nor Stoneleigh or Weston under Wetherley
- site assessments not properly updated, inadequate
- poor accessibility
- lack of local infrastructure, community facilities and capacity constraints
- drainage /sewage issues
- adverse impact on environment, wildlife, recreational activity
- additional congestion
- pollution

Object

Representation ID: 70114

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Robert Cochrane

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The modifications have not been subject to proper consultation. They do not take in to account impacts on infrastructure. There is no clarity as to how the local road network in terms of congestion and safety issues will be addressed prior to development. The area experiences poor drainage and suffers from poor air quality which have not been addressed. The access is dangerous. There are insufficient school and GP places. No open space is identified. No clear proposals for the site layout. No regard is given to the impacts on the green belt and long term sustainability.
In all this is just an outline concept which cannot be sound.

Object

Representation ID: 70117

Received: 21/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Simon Wassall

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan has not identified the infrastructure to support the level of growth including schools, health, roads.
The access to Site H53 is steep and addressing this will have a significant impact on the village hall. Barcheston Drove is narrow and will struggle to cope with construction traffic.

Object

Representation ID: 70145

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Michael Staley

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

This site would have merit of a new access road from Birmingham Road in to Hatton Park could be provided. Although this would not help congestion on Birmingham Road, it would provide a third access point from the estate on the Birmingham Road

Object

Representation ID: 70168

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Ms. Catlin Wilkie

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposals: -
- Hatton Park identified as growth village to allow green belt to be developed
- insufficient local amenities, facilities and services
- poor public transport provision and slow service
- no safe alternatives to car travel
- additional construction traffic
- additional congestion generated by new housing

Object

Representation ID: 70174

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Steve Halliday

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The proposals for Hatton Park are not consistent with the NPPF for te following reasons:
Transport: para 32 requires safe and suitable access. Birmingham Road is already congested and will get worse as a result of housing proposals. Access through Hampton on the Hill is not a suitable alternative. The access point for site H28 is not safe.
Cumulative impacts: the cumulative impacts of proposals in Hatton Park and Hampton Magna need to be considered, plus new homes at Opus 40 and expansion at Warwick Parkway. Together this is likely to have a major impact on traffic flows. Theoretical modelling has failed to address these issues adequately. This will have knock-on effects for public transport too.
Infrastructure: The general superficial assurances in the IDP are not sufficient for water supply, waste water, and energy. No assessment has been made in relation to GP surgeries.
The plan is not positively prepared. It should encourage reductions in green house gas emissions and reduce congestion and should minimise the need to travel. The allocations at Hatton Park conflict with these requirements.
The Plan is not justified: the proposals for 175 dwellings at Hatton Park has not been justified including as measured against the capacity of Birmingham Road. The indicative capacity at Hampton Magna has been significantly exceeded, but no account has been taken of the impact of this on infrastructure.
The sustainability appraisal for an adjacent site to H28 was considered for Gypsy and Travellers but was assessed as having a major negative impact relating to air, water and soil and the prudent use of land. There were also concerns regarding noise, air quality and light pollution which could have negative impacts on health.
The plan is not effective particularly in relation t infrastructure delivery which lacks detailed assessments for water, sewerage sand electricity transmission. Drainage is already an issue on Birmingham Road and an assessment has not been made as to how this should be mitigated. Further no assessment has been of the capacity at Hampton Magna GP surgery to cope with the additional housing. The education capacity an future has not been fully assessed and there is no clear plan to put in place expanded accommodation at the time it is needed.
The Plan is not legally compliant as the site at Hatton Park has failed the sustainability assessment

Object

Representation ID: 70183

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Hatton Park Residents Association

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to allocation: -
- lack of proper consultation
- loss of green belt
- no housing need demonstrated
- Local Wildlife Site at Hatton Park - wildlife and plant life would be adversely affected by development
- poor vehicular access to estate
- no significant local facilities or services
- Residents' Association own land that would be needed for access to site and would be unwilling to sell
- loss of recreational amenity
- road safety issues
- demolition and relocation of village hall access / car park will damage local amenity

Object

Representation ID: 70186

Received: 11/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. & Mrs. Geoffrey & Joan Simpson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

H27 and H51 at Hampton Magna and other proposed allocations in the vicinity of Hampton Magna, H28 (north of Birmingham Road Hatton) and H53 (Brownley Green Lane, Hatton) will put too much traffic pressure on the existing network that is currently struggling to cater for traffic movements, this will lead to congestion and an increase in dangerous parking on what are residential or rural type carriageways.
Schools and other services in the locality will not be able to accommodate the needs of the expanding population.

Object

Representation ID: 70217

Received: 12/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. M. Farnsworth

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The infrastructure will not be able to cope with the amount of development proposed for Hampton Magna and Hatton Park, particularly the roads which are already congested. Noise is also an issue that needs to be addressed. The additional cars would give rise to traffic safety concerns. The doctors and local school would also come under more pressure. These sites are green belt and instead of using these site, more should be done to bring forward brownfield sites. the proposals will discourage cycling and walking as the roads will be busier and more dangerous.