H53 - Hatton Park - Brownley Green Lane

Showing comments and forms 61 to 90 of 160

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69204

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Harry Salisbury

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals: -
- roads too narrow for construction traffic
- adverse impact on local facilities e.g. village hall, parking, play areas and orchard
- children's play areas would become dangerous
- additional congestion would be generated
- serious road safety problems would be exacerbated
- Housing need projections based on a data blip and not necessarily accurate
- loss of green belt not justified by special circumstances
- environmentally unsustainable - lacks public transport
- additional local infrastructure and services requirements not identified

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69207

Received: 14/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Kirsty Roe

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Insufficient infrastructure to support new and additional homes such as schools.
Barcheston Drive too narrow to support heavy machinery and vehicles for housing construction and unsafe given the proximity to playground.
Birmingham Road already very busy during peak traffic, will struggle to cope with extra traffic from new homes.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69212

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Elizabeth Rochford

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Barcheston Drive already suffers from safety issues due to carriageway width and traffic calming measures. The local bus and waste lorries struggle to gain sufficient access due to traffic calming; addition of construction traffic in relation to proposed allocation will make road very unsafe.
Access to proposed allocation is adjacent to car park entrance to the Village Hall and children's play ground which will become dangerous if the allocation is approved.
The gradient of the land may require additional land to ensure appropriate access is made.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69214

Received: 14/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Kulbinder Rai

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals: -
- roads too narrow for construction traffic
- adverse impact on local facilities e.g. village hall, parking, play areas and orchard
- children's play areas would become dangerous
- additional congestion would be generated
- serious road safety problems would be exacerbated
- Housing need projections based on a data blip and not necessarily accurate
- loss of green belt not justified by special circumstances
- environmentally unsustainable - lacks public transport
- additional local infrastructure and services requirements not identified

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69223

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Sylvia Pavlik-Baker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals: -
- roads too narrow for construction traffic
- adverse impact on local facilities e.g. village hall, parking, play areas and orchard
- children's play areas would become dangerous
- additional congestion would be generated
- serious road safety problems would be exacerbated
- Housing need projections based on a data blip and not necessarily accurate
- loss of green belt not justified by special circumstances
- environmentally unsustainable - lacks public transport
- additional local infrastructure and services requirements not identified

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69226

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Barbara Owen

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A development of 55 dwellings will exacerbate existing road problems and greatly reduce the enjoyment of those already living in the area. Access to Hatton Park- especially when traffic is diverted onto the Birmingham Road from the A46 / M40(this occurs quite frequently).

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69227

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. David Owen

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A development of 55 new houses will compound the existing access and egress difficulties. This will reduce the enjoyment of those living in the locality. Access to Hatton Park can be difficult, especially when traffic is diverted from the A46/ M40 onto the A4177 (Birmingham Road). This is becoming more frequent.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69228

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Ian Newman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

No comments made

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69231

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Linda Newman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

No comments made

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69234

Received: 14/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Noreen Lomasney

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals: -
- infrastructure requirements not identified for new development
- increased traffic congestion
- adverse impact on safety of playground
- adverse impact on village hall, play area, orchard, sports facilities and parking
- adverse impact of construction traffic on narrow road systems
- unsustainable site - lack of local infrastructure including public transport and schools will necessitate additional car use

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69237

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Emma Lessard

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals: -
- infrastructure requirements not identified for new development
- increased traffic congestion
- adverse impact on road safety
- adverse impact on safety of playground
- adverse impact on village hall, play area, orchard, sports facilities and parking
- adverse impact of construction traffic on narrow road systems
- unsustainable site - lack of local infrastructure including public transport and schools will necessitate additional car use
- loss of green belt

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69239

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Louise Langstone

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposal: -
- exceptional circumstances to justify removal of site from green belt not demonstrated
- loss of high quality agricultural land
- adverse impact on biodiversity and habitats
- risk of flooding

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69243

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Matthew King

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposal: -
- Barcheston Drive not suitable for construction traffic
- increased road safety issues for pedestrians and road users
- congestion will be exacerbated
- loss of green belt will adversely affect character of district and its benefits as a place to live
- should regenerate rather than remove green belt
- extra amenities / facilities would be required
- adverse impact on character of area of additional urbanising development

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69247

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Wendy King

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals: -
- adverse impact on safety of playground
- adverse impact of construction traffic on narrow road systems
- adverse impact on village hall
- unsustainable site - lack of local infrastructure

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69251

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Dr Jan Kapma

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Birmingham Road already very busy and congested and more homes will add to this problem.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69254

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Ryan Kapma

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Birmingham Road is already very busy and congested at peak times, and more homes will add to this problem.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69257

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Claire Kapma

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Barcheston drive too narrow for lorries and heavy plant movements.
Access road too close to children's playground.
Birmingham Road already very busy and congested, more homes will add to this.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69260

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Miss Bethany Kapma

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Birmingham Road is already very busy and congested at peak times and more homes will add to this problem.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69264

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Michael Hull

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals: -
- roads too narrow for construction traffic
- adverse impact on local facilities e.g. village hall, parking, play areas and orchard
- children's play areas would become dangerous
- additional congestion would be generated
- serious road safety problems would be exacerbated
- Housing need projections based on a data blip and not necessarily accurate
- loss of green belt not justified by special circumstances
- environmentally unsustainable - lacks public transport
- additional local infrastructure and services requirements not identified

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69265

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Graham Holmes

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Additional traffic from this development will increase the risk of accidents on the A4177.
The exceptional circumstances for releasing this land from the green belt are questionable

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69270

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Julie Holmes

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Barcheston Drive is too narrow for vehicles during the construction phase. This could present a danger to pedestrians and will damage the local environment.
The children's play area would become more dangerous as it would be next to an access road. Fencing would need to be put in place to mitigate this. The location of the junction with Barcheston Drive is on a corner and is far from ideal.
The housing projections are based on a "blip" in demand and in reality growth may not follow the same trajectory. It is therefoe questionable whether the exceptional circumstances for removing the land from the green belt exist. The proposed access is very steep and additional land would be needed to counteract this - this will impact on the village hall and its parking. infrastructure will struggle to support the additional homes. Birmingham Road is already congested and the additional traffic will increase safety risks. Public transport schools and shops are also lacking and therefore the proposal does not achieve sustainable development. The Local Plan does not address schools health facilities or road improvements.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69273

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Ms. Sarah Hayward

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Insufficient school places to accommodate additional houses.
Lack of facilities (shops etc) to support additional houses.
Birmingham Road is dangerous and is congested.
The proposals will affect the children's park and safety issues

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69274

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Phil Garner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The infrastructure, especially Birmingham Road, will struggle to support the traffic generated.
The proposed access is steep and would affect the village hall, play area, orchard and car parking.
Barcheston Drive is not suitable for heavy traffic

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69280

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Edward Walpole-Brown

Agent: Brown and Co

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

To maintain our objection to the proposed allocations, etc. of Sites H28 and H53 at Hatton Park and the fact that Hatton Green has still not be classified as a Growth Village or another category created and generally the inappropriateness of some of the sites indicated. They lead to development in far less sustainable and appropriate locations and will be challenged in the Inquiry process.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69283

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Oliver Fewtrill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposal: -
- existing levels of traffic causing problems
- adverse impact on safety of playground
- lack of local infrastructure
- adverse impact on play area

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69284

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Lance Fewtrill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposal: -
- increased traffic congestion
- adverse impact on road safety
- adverse impact of construction traffic on narrow road systems

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69285

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Sigrun Fewtrill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals: -
- houses built too close to existing village hall likely to generate complaints
- adverse impact on safety of playground

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69286

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Deborah Deeming

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals: -
- steep access will be dangerous in icy conditions
- parking will be displaced and will exacerbate congestion and road safety issues
- adverse impact on village parking
- lack of local infrastructure

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69294

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Christina Davenport

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals: -
- road network inadequate to accommodate construction traffic
- poor access
- adverse impact on village hall, play area, sports area and orchard
- traffic infrastructure will be overwhelmed by additional congestion

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69297

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Patricia Cook

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposal: -
- inappropriate to locate houses next to village hall
- will impact on use of hall
- access will cause safety issues with children's play area
- roads too narrow

Full text:

See attached

Attachments: