H53 - Hatton Park - Brownley Green Lane

Object

Representation ID: 69298

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Judith Coker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Access to site too narrow for heavy traffic during construction (Barcheston Drive / Brownley Green Lane).
Access from village hall is very steep.
to provide sufficient road infrastructure to counteract this more land would be needed.
This site should not be included in the plan.
Existing children's play area would become unsafe as close to access road.

Object

Representation ID: 69299

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Ian Coker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Site should not be included.
Barcheston Drive and Brownley Green Lane too narrow for construction traffic.
Access from village hall car park very steep - providing sufficient infrastructure would need additional land.

Object

Representation ID: 69302

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Miss Michelle Boyle

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
- inadequate access for construction traffic
- inadequate local facilities
- local roads already congested - increased likelihood of road traffic accidents
- adverse impact on safety of children's play area
- inadequate site access
- loss of open space and increase in traffic will adversely affect amenity of area.

Object

Representation ID: 69304

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Alan Barrett

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
- local plan has not identified level of infrastructure needed to support new housing (e.g. new schools, health facilities and road infrastructure)
- adverse impact on safety of children's play area adjacent to access road and increased traffic
- environmentally unsustainable site - poor infrastructure will necessitate additional car use contrary to NPPF
- adverse impact of construction traffic on residential amenity

Object

Representation ID: 69305

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Graham Baker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposals: -
- roads too narrow for construction traffic
- adverse impact on local facilities e.g. village hall, parking, play areas and orchard
- children's play areas would become dangerous
- additional congestion would be generated
- serious road safety problems would be exacerbated
- Housing need projections based on a data blip and not necessarily accurate
- loss of green belt not justified by special circumstances
- environmentally unsustainable - lacks public transport
- additional local infrastructure and services requirements not identified

Object

Representation ID: 69306

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Jagdish Bains

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Local infrastructure does not support additional housing - lack of school places, shops, public transport.
Playground adjacent to road junction for new estate would be highly dangerous, especially due to site gradient.

Object

Representation ID: 69308

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Sarah Bacon

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
- serious implications for pedestrian and road safety
- new building will increase traffic both during and after construction
- estate roads are busy enough and further adverse impact on buses
- roads not suitable for construction traffic
- adverse impact on safety of play areas
- access poorly located and congested
- increased congestion on local roads

Object

Representation ID: 69309

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Julie Bacchus

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposals: -
- Barcheston Drive too narrow for construction traffic
- adverse impact on village hall, play / sport areas
- danger to children
- additional congestion
- many houses on Chase Meadow - local residents don't support more

Support

Representation ID: 69423

Received: 21/04/2016

Respondent: Nigel Gough Associates Ltd

Mod 16, para 2.81 and Mod 19 Policies Map
2.1.1 Our clients support, in principle, the release of their land edged red for housing
Identified as H53 'Hatton Park, Brownley Green Lane' for an estimated 55 dwellings (page 34 of the Table of Proposed Modifications)
2.1.2 If formally Adopted our Clients will immediately seek to bring the land forward for development

Object

Representation ID: 69454

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Wilkie

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Green belt boundaries should only be changed in exceptional circumstances and is not justified in this case.
Hatton Park should not be considered a "growth village" as it does not have amenities such as schools and doctors that are required to justify changing the green belt boundary.
Poor / dangerous access to site
Adverse impact on local amenities
Lack of services / facilities, including school capacity
Increased traffic on already busy road

Object

Representation ID: 69474

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Nicholas Dale Goodman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Barcheston Drive too narrow for construction traffic
- Danger to pedestrians.
- access via village hall carpark steep; to provide sufficient infrastructure to counteract gradient additional land would need to be acquired.
- Children's play area would become dangerous next to access road.
- wider road infrastructure will struggle to support additional traffic
- increase accident risks
- housing need projections based on inaccurate information
- no justification for loss of green belt
- environmentally unsustainable - lack of local infrastructure requires additional car use.
- infrastructure needed to support development not identified in plan.

Object

Representation ID: 69500

Received: 21/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Christopher Cresswell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to H53. The H53 should be removed for the following reasons:
It is in an unsustainable location for the proposed number of units
It contains highways access issues which would affect the operation and sustainability of the village hall/children's play area
This change of use of green belt land will set a precedent for expansion around Hatton Park
The land identified is inappropriate for housing as there is insufficient infrastructure and it would fail to comply with the NPPF. It prevents the countryside from encroachment and would permanently change the open character of Hatton Park.
It is likely that any future development proposal on this land would be considered unsound on the basis that it does not meet the test for 'exceptional circumstances' criteria to be applied when changing the status of green belt land.

Object

Representation ID: 69520

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Katherine Upton

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Access via Barcheston Drive seems far too dangerous & hazardous. This road is very narrow and the local bus has enough trouble getting around Hatton Park. It is ridiculous to think that heavy lorries and site traffic will be able to navigate the bollards in the centre of this drive.

Object

Representation ID: 69521

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Barry Williams

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

-Barcheston Drive cannot cope with heavy plant traffic and it would be unsafe for local residents and children who go to the park.
-The access to the site is too steep and right next to a children's play area which is unsafe.
- Birmingham road is already congested and this route into Warwick is very busy at rush hour. The wider infrastructure needs working.
- The loss of the children's play area and basketball park is not in the residents' interests, as a minimum these will become 'no go' areas as they will be next to a building site.

Object

Representation ID: 69523

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Jude Williams

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

-Barcheston Drive is not suitable for big heavy trucks as the road is narrow and double parked.
-Barcheston drive is used by children walking to the school, bus stop which would make it dangerous to walk on path.
-The building site is next to the park and would be dangerous for the children to play near the building site.
-The village hall, park and orchard are the only recreational area for children and families to play safely.
-The access to the site is not safe and doesn't provide suitable road infrastructure to cater for the workmen and vehicles needed.

Object

Representation ID: 69524

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Mr D Wheeler

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

-The local roads and estate would be too congested for construction traffic and could impact on the bus route and add extra traffic to the already busy Birmingham road.
-The services to the estate already seem stretched , so adding these extra dwellings would necessitate additional works to support them in the long term.
-The impact on the village hall seems significant this area acts as a natural surface water drain and could increase flooding as found in other areas where land has been developed.

Object

Representation ID: 69525

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Ruth Wheeler

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

-Barcheston drive struggles with buses so it will be very difficult for heavy construction vehicles coming onto Hatton Park during the construction phase. There has been a lot of spent on village hall car park and this facility is now in jeopardy due to the new houses requiring access. The wide infrastructure is a major concern as Birmingham Road is congested in morning due to traffic. The services to the estate already seem stretched to capacity (water/internet).

Object

Representation ID: 69549

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Alexander Howe

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Barcheston Drive is too narrow for construction traffic.
The proposed access is very steeps and mitigating this will impact on the village hall, play area, orchard and parking. In particularly he play area would become dangerous . Further afield Birmingham Road will is already congested and will become worse and safety concerns will be worse. Given uncertainty surrounding the housing projections, there are questions about whether the exceptional circumstance for green belt release can be justified.

The site is unsustainable and the lack of local infrastructure will require additional car journeys. The Local Plan does not identify the infrastructure needed to support the level of development proposed.

Object

Representation ID: 69551

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Alka Groves

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

-Local infrastructure cannot support additional housing and traffic.
-WDC should be identifying brownfield sites and not green belt.
-Dangerous for kids to have construction site near their play area.

Object

Representation ID: 69553

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Martin Goode

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The site is unsuitable environmentally as lack of local infrastructure requires additional car use and does not comply with the National Planning Policy Frameworks requirement to secure sustainable development.

Object

Representation ID: 69554

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Cheryl Goode

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Roads will struggle to cope with additional traffic

- Will place unacceptable pressure on existing local services and facilities

Housing need forecasts are based on a blip in demand and are not needed

No special circumstances to support development

Object

Representation ID: 69556

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Fay Foster

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The site is difficult to access . the local amenities and infrastructure cannot support the proposed development

Object

Representation ID: 69557

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. David Foster

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

-Greenbelt should not be available for residential development.
-Birmingham road is not suitable for heavy trucks, plant and equipment.
-Additional houses will impact severely on the existing and limited local amenities.
-Addition in traffic will be more dangerous.

Object

Representation ID: 69558

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Christopher Fenwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

-Objection towards building of houses.
-Local infrastructure will not be able to support the additional traffic.
-Birmingham road is already busy, had accidents, fatalities due to the congestion.
-Housing projects on greenbelt are based on a blip in demand and not valid, hence housing may not be needed.

Object

Representation ID: 69560

Received: 19/04/2016

Respondent: Miss Vanessa Evans

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

-Barcheston Drive is too narrow for lorry and heavy plant movements.
-Proposed access from the village hall car park is very steep, in order to provide sufficient infrastructure to counteract the steep gradient additional land above that highlighted in the proposal would need to be acquired.
-Children's play area would become dangerous as it would be next to an access road.
-The wider infrastructure will struggle to support the additional traffic and also will increase the risk of accidents.
-Site is unsuitable environmentally as the lack of local infrastructure requires additional car use.
-Necessary infrastructure needed to support the additional houses is not identified in the local plan.
Housing need based on a blip in demand and growth will not necessarily follow the same trajectory, hence fewer houses than forecast

Object

Representation ID: 69565

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Andrew Dove

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

-Hatton park cannot handle the heavy traffic.
-The proposed development would have a detrimental impact on local facilities-village hall and playground and the playground would be left next to an access road.
-Local amenities could not handle the additional pressure of development, and water pressure is already insufficient.
-Local schools and roads cannot cope with extra demand.

Object

Representation ID: 69566

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Angela Dove

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Barcheston Drive too narrow for construction traffic
- Danger to pedestrians
- access via village hall carpark steep; providing sufficient infrastructure to counteract gradient would require additional land
- Children's play area dangerous next to access road.
- wider road infrastructure will struggle to support additional traffic
- increase accident risks
- housing need projections based on inaccurate information
- green belt loss unjustified
- environmentally unsustainable; lack of local infrastructure requires additional car use.
- infrastructure needed to support development not identified in plan.
- water pumping station already beyond capacity; fails regularly to supply existing houses.

Object

Representation ID: 69570

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Ayesha Dikko

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

-Barcheston Drive is too narrow for lorry and heavy plant movements.
-Proposed access from the village hall car park is very steep, in order to provide sufficient infrastructure to counteract the steep gradient additional land above that highlighted in the proposal would need to be acquired.
-Children's play area would become dangerous as it would be next to an access road.
-The wider infrastructure will struggle to support the additional traffic and also will increase the risk of accidents.
-Site is unsuitable environmentally as the lack of local infrastructure requires additional car use.
-Necessary infrastructure needed to support the additional houses is not identified in the local plan.

Object

Representation ID: 69578

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Malcolm Cook

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- local roads too narrow for heavy vehicles.
- unsafe access to site
- development will increase number of cars adversely affect road safety for children and pedestrians
- access via village hall car park will use up large proportion of green belt due to steepness.
- development will increase pressure on existing local schools, doctors and the Birmingham Road.

Object

Representation ID: 69585

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: mr mark betker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

-Barcheston drive lacks the suitable infrastructure to support the application.
-The local infrastructure is currently stressed and will not be able to support any further development.
-The extra traffic would cause even more serious traffic on Birmingham road.
-Local amenities. shops, schools, transport are not suitable and could not absorb additional development.
This allocation would be an encroachment into the green belt.