H53 - Hatton Park - Brownley Green Lane

Object

Representation ID: 69122

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mr & Mrs. Alexander & Beverley Gates

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
-Barcheston Drive too narrow for construction traffic
- poor access from village hall impacts on village hall, play areas, orchard, sports facilities
- need additional car parking
- adverse impact on safety of children's' play areas
- roads adversely affected by congestion
- serious road safety issues
- projected housing need may be inaccurate
- loss of green belt not justified by exceptional circumstances
- environmentally unsustainable site - lack of local facilities and services (e.g. public transport, schools etc.) generate additional vehicle movements
- no supporting infrastructure identified in local plan

Object

Representation ID: 69123

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Russ Hamer

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
-Barcheston Drive too narrow for construction traffic
- poor access from village hall impacts on village hall, play areas, orchard, sports facilities
- parking would be a problem
- roads adversely affected by congestion
- loss of green belt not justified by exceptional circumstances
- environmentally unsustainable site - lack of local facilities and services (e.g. public transport, schools etc.) generate additional vehicle movements
- no supporting infrastructure identified in local plan

Object

Representation ID: 69124

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Stephanie Hill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The proposed road from new build to Barcheston Drive will be impossibly steep and dangerous as is the close proximity to village hall and playground.
no extra school provision for what could be over 100 children.
Utility availability not sustainable.

Object

Representation ID: 69125

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Simon Hodgetts

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
- roads adversely affected by congestion
- adverse impact on safety of children's' play areas
- no supporting infrastructure identified to support additional housing

Object

Representation ID: 69126

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Steven Holtom

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
- no supporting infrastructure identified in local plan
- poor access from village hall impacts on village hall, play areas, orchard, sports facilities
- need additional car parking
- roads adversely affected by congestion

Object

Representation ID: 69127

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Thomas Holtom

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
-Barcheston Drive not suitable for construction traffic
- roads adversely affected by congestion
- adverse impact on safety of children's' play areas
- impacts on village hall

Object

Representation ID: 69130

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Geraldine Jones

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Barcheston Drive is too narrow for construction traffic. Access to the site is very steep and will affect the village hall, play area and parking area. The gradient will pose practical access problems. Increased congestion on Birmingham Rd. Lack of public transport, schools, shops and doctors

Object

Representation ID: 69131

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Ms. Karen Lindon

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Barcheston Drive is too narrow for construction traffic. Access to the site is very steep and will affect the village hall, play area and parking area. The gradient will pose practical access problems. Increased congestion on Birmingham Rd. Lack of public transport, schools, shops and doctors

Object

Representation ID: 69132

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. & Mrs. Richard & Diane Maynard

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Lack of adequate access for construction traffic
Inappropriate access to the site
Exacerbates congestion problems on Birmingham Road
Local infrastructure is inadequate to support the development

Object

Representation ID: 69133

Received: 13/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Meirion Morgan

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The location of the intended allocation is totally unsuitable.
- infrastructure issues
- no special circumstances for this land to be removed from the green belt
- appears to be last-minute addition that has not been properly thought through.
- additional housing to provide for Coventry - not enough evidence to prove that all brownfield alternatives have been utilised.
- site at Hatton Park is not sustainable as there are not enough services, etc. in locality to serve this expanding population.

Object

Representation ID: 69136

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. & Mrs. Frank & Pamela Penlington

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The proposed site for the erection of 55 new houses can only be accessed from Barcheston Drive where the existing traffic calming features make the road too narrow for contractors plant during construction.
If access is through the Village Hall car park, the recreation and children's play facilities and orchard will require new land allocation. Parking at the village hall is already at a premium when the hall is used for public functions

Object

Representation ID: 69137

Received: 14/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Stephen Richardson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

1. Access for construction traffic via Barcheston Drive is unsuitable for heavy plant. Buses already find the traffic calming measures problematic and often have to mount the pavement - causing damage and risk to the large numbers of children who live locally
2. Birmingham Road is already busy and has been subject to a number of recent fatalities - additional housing on this site will increase volume of traffic risk
3. The area already lacks efficient infrastructure (schools, shops, transport) so additional development would appear to be unsuitable environmentally so would encourage greater car use.

Object

Representation ID: 69143

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Alan Shaw

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to allocation: -
- loss of rural setting
- impact on wildlife habitats
- currently has few amenities for children apart from village hall play area / orchard / bus stop / parking
- loss of visual amenity
- loss of community amenity
- loss of green belt unjustified - no special circumstances identified
- housing figures known to be inaccurate, based on inflated number of dwellings
- poor access to site
- construction traffic would cause road safety issues and danger to users of play area
- increased traffic would exacerbate congestion
- insufficient local services and facilities

Object

Representation ID: 69144

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Emma Smith

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

New homes will mean extra traffic. Birmingham Road is already dangerous with so much traffic and cars turning into Hatton Park. The children would be in danger playing on the playground.
There is pressure already on local schools, doctors and public transport. They cannot sustain more residents. Barcheston Drive is too narrow for construction traffic.

Object

Representation ID: 69145

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Philip Southwell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Narrow roads, particularly Barcheston Drive are unsuitable for large 'construction' vehicles. Damage will be caused to verges, bollards and cycle/footpaths. Added risk to pedestrian safety.
Likely to lead to destruction of village hall parking area and possibly to play areas and community orchard.
Difficult because of site topography.
Increased traffic and congestion at peak times and throughout the day. Exit from the estate difficult already and increase in road safety issues. There have been fatalities on this road. Use of the other exit at Charringworth Drive will add to the chaos.
A proposal to have traffic signals on A4177 will create further traffic issues with queuing traffic.
Building in green belt is ecologically unsound and there is inadequate infrastructure.
Drainage issues with water running in the lane after heavy rain.
Increased school, health and shopping facilities needed.
Bus service is underused the majority of residents using their own transport.
Proposal is flawed having not been thought through properly.
Potential for site at Oaklands Farm is again designated green belt on a busy road so close to the canal.
No development anywhere until there is planned infrastructure.

Object

Representation ID: 69148

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Judith Wilkinson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
- unsuitable access, unsuitable for construction traffic
- ground water flooding
- loss of village hall car park
- Birmingham Road at capacity and additional cars will cause further congestion
- loss of green belt
- loss of agricultural land
- adverse impact on local parking and road safety
- roads inaccessible during adverse weather
- lack of local amenities and facilities

Object

Representation ID: 69150

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Sarah Wood

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
- unsuitable access via village hall
- road too narrow - impossible for construction traffic to access site and on street parking make it unsafe
- local services and facilities at capacity
- serious road safety issues along Birmingham Road - would struggle to cope with additional traffic
- no indication of improvements to infrastructure
- loss of green belt - should look to brownfield sites

Object

Representation ID: 69151

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Geoffrey Wood

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
- unsustainable site lacks infrastructure e.g. public transport, schools
- will necessitate additional car use
- does not comply with NPPF requirements
- Barcheston Drive too narrow to allow for heavy plant
- proposed access would damage village hall and adjoining play area
- extant congestion

Object

Representation ID: 69153

Received: 14/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Robert Wyatt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

No comments made

Object

Representation ID: 69154

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Helena Wyatt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

No comments made

Object

Representation ID: 69155

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Ms. Frances Bilby

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Barcheston Drive too narrow for long or heavy plant
Proposed access on blind bend
Access from the Birmingham Road - with increased traffic the likelihood of serious accidents will go up

Object

Representation ID: 69156

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Barnaby Davis

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Access for heavy plant movements via Barcheston Drive is not viable.
Increased traffic - concerned that Birmingham Road will not cope.
Also, local infrastructure is unlikely to cope with 55 new homes e.g. local roads, facilities etc.
Worried about any impact on the children's play area and village hall.

Object

Representation ID: 69158

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Theresa Dunne

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
- adverse impact of construction traffic on narrow road systems
- adverse impact on grass verges and cycle paths of traffic being forced to drive over them

Object

Representation ID: 69159

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Daralyn Warren

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Barcheston Drive too narrow for contractors vehicles.
Too near to children's play area - dangerous.
Birmingham Road congested at peak times already - more accidents.

Object

Representation ID: 69167

Received: 21/04/2016

Respondent: Ms. Diane Austin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposals: -
- increased traffic congestion
- adverse impact on road safety
- poor / unsafe access to site
- infrastructure requirements not identified for new development
- lack of capacity in local facilities and services e.g. schools, GP etc.
- adverse impact on village hall, play area
- adverse impact on safety of playground

Object

Representation ID: 69197

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Miss Nicola Wood

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
- additional traffic congestion will exacerbate current problems
- road network narrow and unsuitable for extra vehicles / construction traffic
- lack of local infrastructure / services and facilities means residents will rely on cars so development will not be sustainable

Object

Representation ID: 69198

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Charles Warden

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
- poor access for construction traffic
- adverse impact on village hall and playground
- adverse impact on parking and orchard
- adverse impact on congestion
- loss of green belt
- loss of farmland
- further housing will exacerbate access to and parking in Warwick

Object

Representation ID: 69199

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Miss Wendy Turner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

No comment made

Object

Representation ID: 69202

Received: 13/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs Ruth Speczyk

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposals: -
- roads too narrow for construction traffic
- existing congestion would be made worse
- parking problems will be exacerbated
- adverse impacts on local facilities and amenities such as village hall, playground, orchard, sports facilities
- loss of parking
- children's play area would become dangerous
- housing need projections not accurate and based on a data blip
- loss of green belt not justified by special circumstances
- unsustainable development not supported by public transport
- additional infrastructure and facilities needed

Object

Representation ID: 69203

Received: 14/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Diane Smith

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
- Barcheston Drive too narrow for heavy plant
- adverse impact on amenities and facilities e.g. village hall, car parking, playground
- additional congestion would be generated
- additional local infrastructure would be required