Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Town Centres?

Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 132

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1673

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1705

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Representation Summary:

Insuffienient consideration is not given to brownfield usage.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1781

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1809

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1830

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Representation Summary:

Not aware of all options.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1910

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Ed Rycroft

Representation Summary:

Whilst I don't like it the reason "out of town" developments do so well is because they are easy to get to with a good road infrastructure, and have free parking.

unfortunately we won't be able to provide any of these within either of the 3 town centres. You clearly haven't looked at all the possible options and the infrastructure that is needed to go with it.

I agree with supporting the independant retailers, but lots of shops remain empty like the old lee longlands building and the rent is too high in the town centre. Address this first then develop

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1975

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Ken Hope

Representation Summary:

(6.a) Paragraph 6.2 is so important BUT paras 6.14, 6.15 and 6.16 are only paying 'lip-service' to how to reach a staisfactory state. Another 'nice' statement.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2043

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: mr john jacques

Representation Summary:

insufficient research and lack of consultation with local organisations.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2070

Received: 05/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Kerr

Representation Summary:

with regard to Warwick, (6.15), ephasis should be given to the 'reuse and development' of premises or spaces that fall into disuse rather than any additional development.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2098

Received: 06/09/2009

Respondent: Nick Booker

Representation Summary:

Kenilworth needs to build on its niche position by developing for example specialist high quality shops - it beggars belief that given the relative affluence of the town there is neither a good kitchen/cook shop nor an antiques shop. It does have a a re-vitalised book shop in Talisman Sq and one can only it hope survives in a very competitive book market and it has two picture framing/picture gallery shops . Some how critical mass needs to be built but not in terms of the usual well known brand names that we can access elsewhere.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2146

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Representation Summary:

The expanding Warwick University campus should make a provision for greater numbers of student accommodation means. This would release large numbers of houses of houses/flates in Leamington Spa etc and hugely reduce student commuting.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2309

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2388

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

Representation Summary:

No.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2425

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2486

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: British Waterways

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2528

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Margrave

Representation Summary:

You have dismissed giving any consideration to planning outside of the three 3 largest towns and ignore shoppers' needs in Whitnash, Bishop's Tachbrook. The strategy is woolly and unclear.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2549

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Agree policy of promoting retail/entertainment facilities locally, but believe that sufficient facilities already exist, especially in Kenilworth.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2611

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Representation Summary:

A better look at areas which can be redeveloped - i.e Southbank Court.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2670

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Representation Summary:

Leamington is an important venue for people from out of town who bring in much needed trade. It's essential appeal is the variety of small specialist shops not chains. Preferential rates should be available for single shop owners.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2696

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2734

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Representation Summary:

Chados Street's development will destroy existing businesses and parking spaces and will cost too much in the current economic crisis. Traffic management must be the top priorit for Warwick, or its historic building will suffer through pollution. Mandatory Park And Ride would address this problem. Kenilworth's Priory and Talisman Theatre's could be emphasised as attractive to visitors.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2786

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Representation Summary:

Kenilworth town centre is pleasant and attractive. We do need a fully manned Police Station.
Empty shops will hopefully find new tenants soon.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2828

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2867

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2973

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Representation Summary:

Shops/ Businesses are closing at an alarming rate if you had not noticed.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3030

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Rhyan Barry

Representation Summary:

I am somewhat confused on how the council believes building new houses will bring new jobs to the area. The only jobs available will be building ones of which I would hope the council will employ our local builders. If the plan is to build new industrial parks then the recent economic recession has freed up many sites which should be filled first before any new build is started. If there is a great need for industrial sites then why has the Ford Foundry site been allowed to remain empty for over two years now?

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3076

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Representation Summary:

There must be a greater spread of house development throughout the district with emphasis on the brown field sites and a balanced spread to all villages.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3148

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.C Hadfield

Representation Summary:

Keniworth town centre has been developed sensibly and I would assume that Talisman Square will be regenerated following the arrival of Waitrose. The future of the Woolworth's store is obviously a problem. New building at Abbey End has been done sensitively.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3199

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Robert Burtonshaw

Representation Summary:

No building on North Leamington Allotments

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3201

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Robert Burtonshaw

Representation Summary:

No building on North Leamington Allotments