Do you agree with the Strategic Objectives for Warwick District?

Support

Representation ID: 33560

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Thomas Bates & Son LTD

Agent: Andrew Martin Associates

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33571

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Revelan Group

Agent: Harris Lamb

Support recognition there is a requirement to maintain a strong and growing economy through ensuring that a range of suitable sites are available for employment uses.

Support a sufficient amount of land for housing to be allocated to meet current and future housing needs.

Support

Representation ID: 33606

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

It may be suitable to add an objective to ensure that development is carried out in a sustainable manner. There should be a preference for redeveloping previously developed land in the first instance, including a full assessment of the potential use of sites allocated in the adopted Local Plan.

North Leamington School can contribute towards the supply of available housing land. This would best be achieved by amending the MDS boundary and to provide specific support for housing development.

Support

Representation ID: 33639

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: CB Richard Ellis

Agent: Barton Willmore

Support for ensuring a sustainable, innvoative and productive economy and the role to support development of suitable land and buildings for retail within the town centres to meet future needs and ensure their continued vibrancy and vitality.

Support

Representation ID: 33672

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr T Steele

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Support

Object

Representation ID: 33715

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr John Burman

Agent: Bigwood Associates Ltd

The focus should be on sustaining and growing the key villages as well as the urban areas. There should be reference to housing for the elderly and affordable housing.

Support

Representation ID: 33727

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Sharba Homes

Agent: PJPlanning

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33747

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Shirley Estates

Agent: Davis Planning Partnership

Support sustainable planned growth for rural communities.

Support

Representation ID: 33800

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Support, however, there should be reference to the possibility that further employment allocations and offices could be made outside the town centre linked to the Preferred Options.

Comment

Representation ID: 33823

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Environment Agency

Supports the strategic objectives.
Re: objectives 1, 2 and 3, site allocations must have regard to the SFRA. Use of previously developed land should be a priority. Contaminated sites must be remediated in accordance with PPS23.
Development must not encroach onto the flood zone. Re: objective 11, gypsy and traveller sites must be within Flood Zone 1. If located in rural areas, foul drainage provision must be investigated.
Supports objectives 13 & 15, Core Strategy should include policies directing all new development away from flood zones 2 and 3; a requirement for Surface Water Management Plans and for development to recognise the aims of WFD. All development in areas of flood risk should be sequentially tested and comply with PPS25. Supports Objective 17.

Object

Representation ID: 33859

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Lenco Investments

Agent: RPS Planning

Suggest adding:

"Reduce the need to travel by locating new housing growth close to existing major employment locations"

Comment

Representation ID: 33877

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Agreed, pending the final determination of the RSS.

Object

Representation ID: 33910

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Kenilworth Town Council

Again the Strategy Objectives are a proper aim, but as far as set out in our general response we have grave doubts regarding the effects on Kenilworth.

Object

Representation ID: 33960

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Louis Balestrini

In general ,I understand the need ,but the council has failed to see the likely affect of condensed housing on the countryside.This favours big housing companies with no thought of the people who live locally