Do you agree with the Strategic Objectives for Warwick District?

Object

Representation ID: 5071

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Dawn Keylock

We need to ensure we improve our current position in relation to supporting and improving social, economic, poorly designed estates, environmental issues and crime levels before considering developing new areas.

Object

Representation ID: 5097

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

Unclear objectives - wanting to preserve green space for healthier lifestyles/ building new homes.

Object

Representation ID: 5113

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

The heritage and historic nature of Warwick should not be converted into a "new" town clone.

Object

Representation ID: 5187

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

NO DO NOT AGREE - Due to Inappropriate use of and building/development on GREEN BELT LAND!

Support

Representation ID: 5261

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

There is no suggestion within the 'Social Inclusion and Personal Well-Being section, that the real
needs of Gypsies and Travellers have been assessed in any depth or by consultation with those
groups. By definition, their needs are largely of a transitory nature and therefore difficult to
determine, meaning that a disproportionate, but nevertheless vital, effort may be needed to properly
establish such needs.

Object

Representation ID: 5324

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

There are no references to improving transport and mobility for the whole community. Objective No5 infers that development is the only remedy to improve vibrancy. There is also no reference to developing a learning culture and insufficient reference to the development of cultural attractions.

Support

Representation ID: 5375

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5427

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

Needs to add references to education and health facilities. §4.1-4.4 do nothing for me

Support

Representation ID: 5465

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Illingworth

Few people would disagree with the strategic objectives, but there are too many of them. Some are beyond the power of any authority to deliver. The strategic objectives should be sharper and more focused

Object

Representation ID: 5510

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

We do not agree with point 11. It should be removed.

Object

Representation ID: 5564

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

The strategic objectives must include the mandate to become a leading low carbon community within the UK.

Support

Representation ID: 5605

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: PG Swann

But - help to maintain the present economy of the District by; Stopping the trend (for now) of allowing the redevelopment of exisitng employment premises/sites. The level of housing provision is unlikely to be matched by the level of requisite employment provision.
Please do not overload town centres, they are already under stress, and sites are limited. Put more emphasis on linking job creation in the comprehensive growth areas, and not just in the ubiquitous 'mixed use' designation - consider dedicated site(s) closely associated with those new preferred housing allocations.

Support

Representation ID: 5642

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5688

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5747

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Develop a culture where the local community is engaged and encourage to partake in local gardening activities to grow food including allotments from existing land and future provision. WDC needs to use its food producing land as effectively as possible to provide for our present and future needs as imports from overseas with carbon miles become more expensive with the changing climate and with 3rd world food demand increasing. Self sufficiency and building on food producing land do not go together

Support

Representation ID: 5803

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5837

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

Any housing development should ensure local people's needs are met, not those from out the area especially as all Council's are doing this. More thought needs to go into what roads, jobsm schools and public transport is needed. Afterwards is too late! Whitnash is a prime example of housing being built but nothing else to support the area once more people move in.

Object

Representation ID: 5897

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Items 12 and 14 protecting the historic and natural environment should not be associated with allowing commercial forces to apply.

Object

Representation ID: 5957

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Object

Support

Representation ID: 5979

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Harris

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 6019

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 6061

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Skidmore

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 6239

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Agreed

Object

Representation ID: 6300

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Cheatle

Not at the risk of losing the image and historic value of Warwickshire.

Object

Representation ID: 6322

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Totally Excessive

Confining growth to one area will cause majore congestion!

Object

Representation ID: 6382

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Veronica Jessamine

No.

Comment

Representation ID: 6423

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

Regeneration in urban areas must be priority to achieve strong sustainable economy. Pollution and poor air quaility must be tackled - targets for improvement defined. Rural communities, their environment/social well being need protection. Large (500+) housing developmentd must be avoided because of their lack of social cohesion.

Object

Representation ID: 6615

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: James Mackay

Object to objectives and content of preferred options:

Support

Representation ID: 6676

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

Especially objective 8 so that recreation places eg. allotments are allowed and provided for within easy reach of both old and new housing areas.

Comment

Representation ID: 6726

Received: 05/11/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council - Heritage & Culture (Museums)

Support the Strategic Objective 13 and suggest that this is achieved through a SPD