Do you agree with the Strategic Objectives for Warwick District?

Comment

Representation ID: 108

Received: 06/07/2009

Respondent: R A Chapleo

It is important to make it clear that these are the strategic PLANNING objectives of the Council.
Not to do so excludes the serrvice that MAINTAIN the health etc of the environment, such as the traditional Environmental Health services - the foundation on which local government was established.

Support

Representation ID: 178

Received: 11/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Alexander Holmes

New development must take account of the essential need to protect and enhance the environment, avoiding any incursion into the Green Belt.

Object

Representation ID: 203

Received: 03/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Baxter

No.

Support

Representation ID: 224

Received: 09/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Duncan Hurwood

I particularly agree with points 12 and 13 and think these should take higher priority when new developments are considered. In particular, green belt land should not be built upon.

Object

Representation ID: 248

Received: 10/07/2009

Respondent: Patricia Robinson

The environment is not being protected. There will be too much destruction of the few green areas left and the strategic aims are totally "pie in the sky".

Object

Representation ID: 315

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D Bolam

Keep off the Green Belt land. This and future generations need it.

Object

Representation ID: 342

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

No.

Support

Representation ID: 419

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

I agree with Green Belt and rural protection but what you are proposing is to destroy that if you build on north and south of Harbury Lane.

Support

Representation ID: 470

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 526

Received: 02/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Stratton

very concerned by the level of building the Warwickshire greenbelt land must be protected.

Support

Representation ID: 540

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 592

Received: 03/08/2009

Respondent: B A Alston

Essential that green belt to north of leamington is protected to prevent merger of coventry/kenilworth/leamington

Object

Representation ID: 602

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 660

Received: 06/08/2009

Respondent: West Midlands RSL Planning Consortium

Agent: Tetlow King Planning

Strategic Objective 6 should be amended to include reference to meeting current and future housing and care needs, as the provision of specialist housing and care facilities will work towards a number of these objectives. A variety of options may include support for people wishing to continue living within their own home, extra care housing, sheltered housing, residential care homes and continuing care retirement communities. Recognition of the contribution these make to each of the headings in this section is particularly important given the high proportion of 'older people' in the District and the projected increase in this particular group.

Comment

Representation ID: 663

Received: 06/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Susan Edkins

The tourism trade will be lost if more houses are built land will be lost.There are enough sports facilities in the area, some are closing because of lack of support.

Object

Representation ID: 693

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

No.

Support

Representation ID: 764

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Yes.

Object

Representation ID: 833

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

This strategy will not be met if the countryside is eaten up with development and there is more traffic and pollution.

Support

Representation ID: 896

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

Except point 11 - Travellers - if provided with land, council tax should be applicable to them.

Object

Representation ID: 949

Received: 22/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Ed Rycroft

This seems to be against your preferred option. development where you've suggested would do very little to tackle the points outlined here. Especially tackling crime and anti-social behavior. Unless you are only allowing middle and upper class families to live on the proposed estates with no criminal records allowed. What about the 4600 council houses you also need to build in these areas as part of the quota? How are you going to stop the crime there? I'm not saying all people on council estates are criminals but there is usually higher levels of crime from a few families.

Object

Representation ID: 962

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Don't believe the volume/scale of growths justified.

Support

Representation ID: 979

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Cllr Tim Sawdon

Yes.

Support

Representation ID: 1052

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Support

Support

Representation ID: 1056

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Great care for point 11 in siting land for Gypsies and Travellers due to their lifestyle and different values (as shown in Kenilworth).

Support

Representation ID: 1130

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Alice Jarrett

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1164

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Support

Comment

Representation ID: 1217

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

No
Point 7 - Where are the increased education facility?
Point 8 - Where are the increased leisure facilities?

Object

Representation ID: 1287

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

No
Where are the school places?
Where are the leisure facilities?

Support

Representation ID: 1354

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association

Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants

The Strategic Objectives listed 1-17 are reflective of the four integrated goals of sustainable development taken from the UK government. They cover all aspects of economic well being, social inclusion, and the protection of the environment.

Object

Representation ID: 1473

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Kundi

Number of people: 2

Object.