Do you agree with the Strategic Objectives for Warwick District?

Support

Representation ID: 1505

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Hamilton

Generally support, BUT the existing heritage and historical integrity should not be sacrificed for short term gain.

Good quality design is very subjective as a concept

Support

Representation ID: 1552

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: B.L.A.S.T.

4a Develop a culture where the local community is engaged and encourage to partake in local gardening activities to grow food including allotments from existing land and future provision. WDC needs to use its food producing land as effectively as possible to provide for our present and future needs as imports from overseas with carbon miles become more expensive with the changing climate and with 3rd world food demand increasing. Self sufficiency and building on food producing land do not go together.

Object

Representation ID: 1594

Received: 30/08/2009

Respondent: EUNICE NICOLSON

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1602

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

Little if any consideration was given to Whitnash as a separate village to Leamington. No protection was offered and virtually all green field sites within Whitnash boundary have now been built upon or allocated.

Object

Representation ID: 1667

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1684

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Object

Support

Representation ID: 1775

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1801

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1807

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Same reasons given for question 3.

Support

Representation ID: 1923

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

support

Object

Representation ID: 2037

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: mr john jacques

no i do not because it is based onspurious unproven assumptions as to real housing needs and vacant land and properties.

Support

Representation ID: 2068

Received: 05/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Kerr

The extension of 'Conservation Areas' to include all pockets of buildings and open spaces of historical and environmental interest would assist in ensuring full consideration is given to any future developments. This as itemised in items 12 & 13 of the 'strategic Objectives'.

Support

Representation ID: 2069

Received: 05/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Kerr

The extension of the 'conservation Areas' to include all pockets of buildings and open spaces of both historical and environmental interest would assist in ensuring that full consideration is given to the impact of any future development. This as stated in items 12 & 13 of the 'Strategic Objectives'.

Support

Representation ID: 2134

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Vital that "citizens are engaged in decision making" and their views are acted upon, not merely noted.

Object

Representation ID: 2299

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2382

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

No.

Object

Representation ID: 2419

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

No.

Support

Representation ID: 2485

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: British Waterways

BW can deliver again all the specified strategic objectives.

Object

Representation ID: 2520

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Object

Object

Representation ID: 2546

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Maintain current strong economy but do not engage on massive unsustainable imposed population/housing expansion. Protect the historic environment for future generations. Do not over develop.

Support

Representation ID: 2605

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Item 11 is very emotive and impossible to satisfy everyone.

Support

Representation ID: 2665

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2728

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Build new properties as long as the green belt is not touched. Flooding fears need to be addressed especially in Wellesbourne and the 150 homes planned to be built near Kineton Road and Brookside Avenue.

Object

Representation ID: 2782

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Do not see how all the objectives can be met - they clash with one another.

Object

Representation ID: 2824

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2863

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2967

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

16 Strategic aims sounds like Utopia but in reality are unrealistic.

Object

Representation ID: 3024

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Rhyan Barry

'Our community has actively minimised environmental impacts' and 'there is a vibrant, viable and sustainable rural community' are two objectives which are blatantly not being met by deciding to build on green belt land.

Support

Representation ID: 3070

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Support

Comment

Representation ID: 3134

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.C Hadfield

Partially, sone of the objectives are in conflict with one another, eg: development of housing and retention of playing fields for a healthy lifestyles.