Object

Representation ID: 61941

Received: 17/01/2014

Respondent: Diane H Aries

Radford Semele
-Evidence for discounting sites 2 and 3 are incorrect and misleading.
-Two independent access assessment have shown vehicle access to sites 2 and 3 onto the A425 is possible at the 50mph speed limit.
-The WDC Environmental Report is not representative of the parcels of land known as Sites 2, 3 and 4 thus provides insufficient evidence for selecting Site 1 as the preferred option.
-Traffic surveys were not carried out at a sufficient time.
-The landscape impact and traffic congestion in the village centre impact would be less at the discounted sites than the preferred option.