Object
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
Representation ID: 61711
Received: 20/01/2014
Respondent: Mr Jethro Lomas
Representation Summary:
Site 2 or 3 should be the preferred options for development because:
-Future development is possible.
-Development would not impact on the view from the Fosse.
-Safe vehicle and pedestrian access can be provided from Site 2 and 3 via a reducation to 30mph which would be expected as the new site becomes part of the village envelope.
-They are an attractive location as it has close access to the Fosse and M40 and would minimise the risk of new commuters through the village, where traffic congestion is already a problem.
-Site 1 would be preserved.
Full text:
see attached