Proposed Modifications January 2016
Search representations
Results for Crest Strategic Projects Limited search
New searchObject
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 20 - DS NEW1
Representation ID: 68917
Received: 15/04/2016
Respondent: Crest Strategic Projects Limited
Agent: d2planning
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Support policy allocation of land at Westwood Heath.
Note cap of 425 dwellings - want to fully understand it and how infrastructure can be provided to allow additional development to take place. Provision of infrastructure should be proportionate.
Welcome partial five-year review of plan but it will not be able to examine green belt boundaries - options for development will not be able to be considered - additional land at Lodge Farm should be released from green belt now.
See attached
Support
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 15 - paras 2.66 to 2.68
Representation ID: 69340
Received: 15/04/2016
Respondent: Crest Strategic Projects Limited
Agent: d2planning
These representations should be read in conjunction with our representations in respect of Mod 14 in relation to Policy DS15 Comprehensive Development of Strategic Sites.
Only one landowner and one developer - enables the site to come forward without any issues regarding ownership. Vision Statement demonstrates how the land can be comprehensively developed with a potential early start on site.
Crest would work with the Planning Authority and all other interested parties to prepare and submit a planning application as soon as practicably possible following the completion of all of the relevant survey work which is already underway.
See attached
Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 14 - Policy DS15
Representation ID: 69342
Received: 15/04/2016
Respondent: Crest Strategic Projects Limited
Agent: d2planning
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The proposed modification recognises that land currently in the green belt can represent the most sustainable option to accommodate future housing needs. Land at Lodge Farm, Westwood Heath Road is being released from the green belt and allocated for a residential led development of up to 425 dwellings etc. within the Warwick Local Plan.
However, objections are lodged to the non allocation of land under Crest's control at Lodge Farm, Westwood Heath Road. That land should be released from the Green Belt and included within the proposed allocation as demonstrated in the attached Vision Statement.
See attached
Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 1 - Policy DS2
Representation ID: 69345
Received: 15/04/2016
Respondent: Crest Strategic Projects Limited
Agent: d2planning
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Proposed housing provision should be viewed as a minimum and that the Local Plan should plan for additional housing over and above 16,776 new dwellings, given that Coventry's unmet need may be higher than currently identified and if Nuneaton and Bedworth don't agree to take a proportion of Coventry's need.
See attached
Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 2 - Para 2.6
Representation ID: 69348
Received: 15/04/2016
Respondent: Crest Strategic Projects Limited
Agent: d2planning
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Support Local Plan's position in meeting unmet housing needs of adjoining Districts. Must ensure that the full unmet housing need is met from those Districts. Notes Memorandum of Understanding between the various Authorities but concerns about: -
a) whether full OAN for Coventry City has been identified - have lodged objections to emerging Coventry City Local Plan; and
b) a number of Districts do not appear to agree to their proportion of the unmet housing need for Coventry or indeed want to leave it too late in their respective plans.
See attached
Support
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 3 - Policy DS4
Representation ID: 69349
Received: 15/04/2016
Respondent: Crest Strategic Projects Limited
Agent: d2planning
Support use of greenfield sites in sustainable locations close to services, facilities, infrastructure and employment.
Support allocation of sit.
See attached
Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 4 - Policy DS6
Representation ID: 69350
Received: 15/04/2016
Respondent: Crest Strategic Projects Limited
Agent: d2planning
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Proposed housing provision should be viewed as a minimum and that the Local Plan should plan for additional housing over and above 16,776 new dwellings, given that Coventry's unmet need may be higher than currently identified and if Nuneaton and Bedworth don't agree to take a proportion of Coventry's need.
See attached
Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 5 - para 2.20
Representation ID: 69351
Received: 15/04/2016
Respondent: Crest Strategic Projects Limited
Agent: d2planning
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Proposed housing provision should be viewed as a minimum and that the Local Plan should plan for additional housing over and above 16,776 new dwellings, given that Coventry's unmet need may be higher than currently identified and if Nuneaton and Bedworth don't agree to take a proportion of Coventry's need.
See attached
Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 6 - Policy DS7
Representation ID: 69352
Received: 15/04/2016
Respondent: Crest Strategic Projects Limited
Agent: d2planning
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Proposed housing provision should be viewed as a minimum and that the Local Plan should plan for additional housing over and above 16,776 new dwellings, given that Coventry's unmet need may be higher than currently identified and if Nuneaton and Bedworth don't agree to take a proportion of Coventry's need.
See attached
Support
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 8 - Policy DS10
Representation ID: 69353
Received: 15/04/2016
Respondent: Crest Strategic Projects Limited
Agent: d2planning
Representations should be read in conjunction with those on Mod 3.
Support the Local Plan's position in that greenfield sites located in sustainable locations are required to meet overall housing provision for District including unmet housing need for Coventry. Also support position that for greenfield sites to be sustainable, land for housing should be identified in the Green Belt close to built-up areas
See attached