Alternative Sites Consultation

Search representations

Results for Environment Agency search

New search New search

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Kenilworth Wardens Cricket Club, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?

Representation ID: 44153

Received: 07/04/2010

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

The catchment area is too small for the watercourse to have the flood plain automatically mapped. Therefore it will require a flood risk assessment (FRA) to level 2 standard.

The site is sensitive in terms of protection requirements for 'Controlled Waters'. The whole formation is classified as Principal Aquifer. The site is located 1.5 km south westerly from a STW public supply borehole and 500m from the River Avon.

There could be Made Ground across the site or impacts from the railway line. We would like to see a site investigation and risk assessment condition to assess risks to controlled waters.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Woodside Training Centre, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?

Representation ID: 44154

Received: 07/04/2010

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

The catchment area is too small for the watercourse to have the flood plain automatically mapped. Therefore it will require a flood risk assessment (FRA) to level 2 standard.

The site is sensitive in terms of protection requirements for 'Controlled Waters'. The whole formation is classified as Principal Aquifer. The site is located 1.5 km south westerly from a STW public supply borehole and 500m from the River Avon.

There could be Made Ground across the site or impacts from the railway line. We would like to see a site investigation and risk assessment condition to assess risks to controlled waters.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Land at Campion School/south of Sydenham?

Representation ID: 44157

Received: 07/04/2010

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

The watercourse to the west of the proposed site has an associated flood plain. There may be approximately 10% of the site lying within flood zone 3 and therefore restricts the amount of developable land. A significant detailed hydraulic modelling will be required for a level 2 standard FRA to be undertaken.

Any design of this proposal should ensure that there is no inappropriate development in the flood plain and ensure there is sufficient easement adjacent to the watercourse. We would also seek enhancements to the water course corridor where possible

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Glebe Farm, Cubbington?

Representation ID: 44158

Received: 07/04/2010

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

The development of this site will require detailed FRA to illustrate how surface water run off will be controlled at green field rates. A holistic drainage design scheme must be developed to demonstrate that there will be no increase in surface water to the adjacent watercourse. As with all the sites SuDS must be utilised and none use fully justified.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Loes Farm, Guy's Cliffe, Warwick?

Representation ID: 44160

Received: 07/04/2010

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

As with all sites over one hectare in size a Flood Risk Assesment will be required to cover site drainage and to consider the watercourse that bisects the centre of the site.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Hurst Farm South, Burton Green?

Representation ID: 44161

Received: 07/04/2010

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

The site is occupied by a large area of flood zone 1. However there will be flood plain associated with the watercourses on the site. Currently there is no indicative flood plain information available because the catchments are less than 3.0km2. Flood plain and easements will have to be determined as part of a level 2 FRA. We will need to agree green field rates of run off via substantial control of surface water run off.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Land at Baginton?

Representation ID: 44163

Received: 07/04/2010

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

The majority will be developable, but there will be floodplain implications for the site.

A detailed level 2 FRA is required to determine the precise flood plain and surface water drainage.

Need to ensure that the development doesn't produce any cross catchment transfers.

The site is sensitive in terms of protection requirements for 'Controlled Waters'. The whole formation is classified as a Principal Aquifer. The site is 2.5 km from two STW public supply boreholes.

As this is a large area, further site investigation will need to confirm the exact environmental details of the site as well as a risk assessment.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.