Object

Representation ID: 2148

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: D E Alderson

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2158

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Support

Representation ID: 2170

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

WDC's position state in 10.43 is very strongly supported. The quality of people's lives is adversely affected by taking away more and more of the green spaces in the towns and villages.

Object

Representation ID: 2171

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2178

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Keefe family

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2219

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: G Lane

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2229

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: A B Partridge

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2239

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Gerrardo Luccio Luccio

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2245

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Peter and Anne Wing

Number of people: 2

* Why is development not proposed for sites in Warwick and Leamington Spa with derelict industries?

Object

Representation ID: 2251

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2271

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Michelle Pye

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2283

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: S Shanahan

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2285

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Other locations more suitable than those proposed are brownfield sites of Baginton Airport and the former car factory at Ryton.

Spreading the development in smaller units throughout the 22 villages in Warwickshire over a period of 10-15 years should seriously be considered.

Object

Representation ID: 2298

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: M Wiles

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2379

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Anonymous 13

Use brownfield sites and save limited green spaces. Coventry airport and Ryton are two possibilities.

Object

Representation ID: 2394

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

No.

Object

Representation ID: 2433

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2470

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Peter Phizackerley

I would support developing brownfield sites and if possible the reduction of the number of properties currently used by students in Leamington.

Finally, I suggest that over the period planned for this development, small scale building adjacent to villages in Warwick District is a much better approach to this housing problem.

Object

Representation ID: 2476

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr D J Bradshaw

Time has come to look at a new town rather than reducting the quality of life for a large number of people in Leamington and Warwick. I not the benefits:

Self contained with its own shops schools and medical facilities
Opportunity to plan the infrastructure
Minimal disruption for the majority

Object

Representation ID: 2482

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: C J Miller

Of the various possibilities which you list my opinion is that development in the 'Land North of Milverton' area would be a very poor choice in that it would have a very serious impact on the Green Belt. I hope that the possibility will be discounted.

Comment

Representation ID: 2494

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: British Waterways

British Waterways considers that possible directions for growth should result in sustainable settlements with a range of facilities offering regeneration and development potential providing for a strategic approach to growth within the district. Areas with sites within and adjacent to the canal corridor accommodate the potential for a range of uses and facilities and offer regeneration and development potential.

Object

Representation ID: 2530

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Margrave

No WDC hasn't considered everything.

Availability: they have asked developers what land they want to sell, rather than considering what land is best suited to actual needs rather than national government's ideas.

Achievability: WDC haven't considered what improvements to infrastructure would be required before jumping to conclusions.

Suitability: have mentioned discounting various plots because of argicultural value, problems with access, but ignored these well known problems when choosing sites, specifically Europa Way, Harbury Lane sites.

Object

Representation ID: 2540

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Debbie Millican

The Council does not appear to have considered land around Hatton village which I would think would be a viable solution as it ha undergone new build in the not too distant past and is ripe to be turned into a small town.

Object

Representation ID: 2557

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Eastern approach to Kenilworth would be spoiled if a mixture of industrial units built in the Thickthorn area. Any increase in affordable housing could be located in Dalehouse Lane/Common Lane area where similar properties are available but as yet unsold.

Object

Representation ID: 2597

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Richard Storey

More attention should be given to potential accommodation above shops in town centres.

Support

Representation ID: 2619

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2669

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Maisey

Council has taken easy option because the land at Thickthorn was offered to them for development. No thought has been given to where these people will work, where their children will go to school or what impact this will have on the character of the town. The intention to build on the rugby club land, and then offer to provide green space and sporting facilities within the development is laughable.

Comment

Representation ID: 2680

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

I think it is essential in a flood risk zone that no attempt should be made to build close to the river. Also there should be some variety in the style of houses permitted in different area otherwise we shall be surrounded by a wheel of Sydenhams.

Support

Representation ID: 2709

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Support

Representation ID: 2710

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Support