Comment

Representation ID: 3529

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Horsley

Build 20-30 houses in several villages

Comment

Representation ID: 3530

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Horsley

Empty student accommodation in Leamington freeing up lots of affordable apartments for local young people and provide halls of residence at University

Comment

Representation ID: 3531

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Horsley

Add more houses linking Coventry and Kenilworth. Kenilworth is exempt building under this preferred option and this doesn't seem fair

Object

Representation ID: 3541

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: R.F. Garner

Green field land of high quality should not be squandered. Future generations will need land suitable for food production. Effort should be put into finding more brown field land or identifying sites of lower agricultural value

Object

Representation ID: 3548

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Chris and Pauline Vaughan

Need to use brownfield land first. Free homes by building halls of residence at University; ask villages if housing needed for first time buyers allowing them to stay in their own area. Land at Finham should be used to meet Warwick's housing requirement.

Object

Representation ID: 3557

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Jean Drew

Do not appear to have taken account of public opinion on options consultation when majority chose south of Coventry.
Additional housing could be located in villages, where needed.
Look for brown field sites

Object

Representation ID: 3566

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

object

Object

Representation ID: 3578

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Jean Shaddick

Finham site should be to meet Warwick requirement. Small sites should be developed to spread the load. Hampton Magna could be expanded as there is a new station with car parking and is close to A46 and motorway.

Comment

Representation ID: 3600

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Anthony & Elaine Barker

Why not consider Peugeot site at Ryton, Baginton Airport or area around Warwick Parkway which is well placed for transport links.

Object

Representation ID: 3605

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Sport England

There is a concern that some sites which were put forward by landowners and developers either contain sports facilities (built/un-built) or where complete grounds.

As the District council does not have a fully compliant PPG 17 strategy in place, there should be a policy of non-development on these sites until this work has been carried out.

Comment

Representation ID: 3615

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Michael Hague

Agent: Brindley Twist Tafft & James

Insufficient consideration has been given to the role which The Crackley Triangle is capable of fulfilling in satisfying the need for additional residential development in and around Kenilworth. The use of a significant area of land which is not in the Green Belt, for residential development, would reduce the need to resort to development on land lying within the Green Belt.

Comment

Representation ID: 3620

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs D H Cowgill

Suggest building on brownfield sites at Coventry Airport, Peugeot, Queensway, Fords and Flavels sites.
Rejuvenate old town to bring in new businesses.

Comment

Representation ID: 3625

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr C K Mason

Alternatives: map brown field sites to avoid large scale development. May be some villages with small sites to develop and infill potential elsewhere, resulting in less pressure at certain points. Check local occupancy rates for potential housing. All towns and villages could share development.

Object

Representation ID: 3628

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Donald Gregson

No consideration to basic infrastructure - roads and transport, primary and secondary schools, healthcare, community facilities, water, drainage, sewage etc.
Impact studies (traffic and environmental) and employment provision studies needed.
No data on which to base current options or reasons given for dismissing public preferences.
Council has not challenged housing requirement based on alleged flawed data.
No explanation as to why Finham site not proposed to meet Warwicks need.

Comment

Representation ID: 3632

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Dominic Simpson

Finham should be retained to meet Warwicks need.
Relocate students to halls of residence to free up family homes and reduce commuting to University.
Villages should be allowed small developments retaining village atmosphere and reignite sense of community lost in towns and cities.
Loss of industry has left significant brownfield sites which should be developed first.

Object

Representation ID: 3637

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Councillor Gary Crookes

Current Coventry road infrastructure insufficient.
WDC local road infrastructure insufficien5t.
Additional road infrastructure would be required in the sub-region.
Current education facilities insufficient.
Costs of developing the above would not be generated from the proposed "possible" development and would fall on Warwickshire Council Tax payers.

Support

Representation ID: 3646

Received: 15/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

support

Object

Representation ID: 3665

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Keay

Exhaust all brownfield sites eg Ryton before green belt.

Object

Representation ID: 3700

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

No - The Lodge Farm site(s) near Burton Green (30ha) could provide 800 homes. The King's Lane site by Finham is enormous - 270ha - and at 40dph could accomodate ALL 10,800 houses required in the Core Strategy. It is wasteful to hand it ALL over to Coventry for 3,500 overspill homes - even at 20dph it could accomodate 3,500 from Coventry AND 1,900 (a Warwick Gates-worth) for the district.

Comment

Representation ID: 3735

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Ailsa Chambers

Brown field sites should be developed at priority.
Reclaim Finham to meet needs of Warwick.
Student housing in Leamington should be freed up for permanent residential use. Council should provide University with financial assistance to build halls of residence on campus.
Avoid large scale housing projects. Provide smaller scale projects situated more sympathetically.

Object

Representation ID: 3745

Received: 13/08/2009

Respondent: Alan N Gandy

Small scale on brown field sites should cover natural growth.

Object

Representation ID: 3787

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Steve Hunt

Further consideration should be given to the release of Green Belt land for housing to the North of Leamington town centre

Object

Representation ID: 3802

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Judy Cobham

Suggestions:
Coventry Airport for sale - buy it. Access good, infrastructure existing.
Re-examine brownfield land around Leamington that has been allocated for employment and has not and will not be taken up.
Put more than 75 houses on Ford Foundry site. Decontamination work costs less than new infrastructure on farm land.
10200 houses in continous urban sprawl nit sustainable community strategy - ask each village to add 100 houses over the same period to achieve right numbers and be eminently sustainable.

Object

Representation ID: 3807

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pat Weake

Houses should be shared out over whole area in small developments or new village. Plenty of suitable places for development:
North and west of Warwick/Leamington
around Kenilworth
Finham
Baginton
Also areas in Leamington - Ford Foundry, Station Approach and south of Sydenham, east of Whitnash.

Comment

Representation ID: 3814

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: J P G Hattersley

Consider:
Majority of new houses should be built at Finham and near Burton Green - benefit students at University so freeing housing in Leamington.
Releasing land for Coventry requirement is inappropriate.
Consider spreading development out, including at Hatton Park to spread impact.

Comment

Representation ID: 3830

Received: 17/08/2009

Respondent: Philip and Barbara Lennon

Should use Finham land for Warwick District not offer to Coventry and develop there or leave as farmland.
Look at possible redevelopment of Coventry Airport, former Peugeot site at Ryton and Arches area of Leamington.
Consider 20-40 houses in each of 22 villages.
Smaller development at Europa Way or Lower Heathcote Farm (not both).
Housing need should be spread across the district and based on local need.

Object

Representation ID: 3851

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Paul and Caroline Whitwood

Brown field sites should be used first. Significant brown field land exists and not proposed for development at Peugeot site in Ryton, Coventry Airport and Leamington arches area.
Disregarded findings of previous consultation when Finham preferred option of respondents and four others excluded from preferred options.
Finham should be developed for Warwick District not Coventry. Bishops Tachbrook and Tachbrook Mallory.
Building student accommodation would free homes in Leamington, reducing traffic. There are other small areas in Warwick and Leamington that could be developed - why have these not been considered or been discounted?

Object

Representation ID: 3869

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

The land to the south of heathcote farm and the land to the west of europa way was only included as options when other consultations were underway. Gary Stephens promised that he would NOW consider the other land options proposed since this consultation began namely the site of the former North Leamington School and Coventry Airport. Warwick council should do a Coventry to Rugby and ask then for some of the Ryton land due to it meeting ALL the criteria the council has used to identify land.

Object

Representation ID: 3871

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Patricia Diane Freeman

There are more green areas for houses to be erected upon.

Comment

Representation ID: 3894

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: L M D Louise, Matthew, David Drinkhall Paul Kalus Anthony Barrett

Recent closures:
The Royal Berni Inn, The Clarendon, The Regent and Manor House.
Regency Arcade emplty for two years.
AP, Ford, Kigass, Potterton: ex-employees working out of area.
Wish to see whole plan withdrawn in favour of other options incorporating requirements of Core Strategy document.
Suggest:
Look at infill sites in towns and regeneration areas - Queensway. Infrastructure already in place and could take large number of houses.
A number of areas around George Street and Tachbrook Road within south town would be ideal for starter homes but have been allocated for student housing.
Villages could expand with affordable housing to support amenities.
Towns want to remain separate as do villages and don't want to become part of Coventry.
Ideal site at Gaydon and around Warwick parkway station.