Object

Representation ID: 43442

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: C E J Durrant

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 43444

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: C E J Durrant

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 43450

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: B M Ellard

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 43452

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: B M Ellard

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 43458

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 43460

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 43466

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: R Pugh

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 43468

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: R Pugh

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 43474

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: H Davies

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 43476

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: H Davies

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 43482

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 43484

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 43490

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: T Bloxham

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 43492

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: T Bloxham

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 43498

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 43500

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 43506

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: G R Archer

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 43508

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: G R Archer

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 43514

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms M Bland

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 43516

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms M Bland

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 43522

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: M E Hoare

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 43524

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: M E Hoare

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 43530

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Brian Boyle

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 43532

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Brian Boyle

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 43538

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Henry Styles

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 43540

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Henry Styles

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 45208

Received: 25/08/2009

Respondent: Miss Madeleine Cox

I therefore urge you to radically rethink the options. Why not use the Finham site which has extensive employment and transport possibilities. Alternatively, look at regeneration opportunities in towns. Brown field sites should be considered and more imaginative schemes thought up. Why not locate small housing developments around the District, thus taking care of the future housing needs of existing communities. The target number of houses could soon be met in this way without there being catastrophic effects on any community or on existing roads and services.