Object

Representation ID: 1501

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Mr J.C. Marlow

Proposal to build homes between Tachbrook and Leamington is a kick in the teeth for residents. It will increase light pollution making stars less visible. I chose to live in a village not a light polluted urban jungle. Once the green belt is lost it will be lost forever. Proposal will increase antisocial behaviour as young people will move ever closer to the village.
Brownfield sites should be used or smaller areas of land to the north and east of Leamington.
If this development goes ahead it will be difficult to sell properties and house prices will go down.

Object

Representation ID: 1513

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Hamilton

More housing on brownfield sites within Leamington- the ford founday site could take far more housing it is 45 acres in size?

Object

Representation ID: 1597

Received: 30/08/2009

Respondent: EUNICE NICOLSON

No
King's Hill is NOT a 'reasonable' option

Object

Representation ID: 1605

Received: 04/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Jim and Jennifer Lord

Sites such as baginton airfield would be better. Increasing the size of existing villages is difficult unless there is adequate infrastructure.

An over provision for future commecial developments - some should be reallocated for housing use.

Future needs of Bishops Tachbrook should be limited to satisfy requirements of the old and the young only.

Object

Representation ID: 1611

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Mr G A Cox

The option to spread small scale development across the 22 villages which could provide a significant number of homes to meet future needs has not been considered This would reduce the impact on traffic, schools and support services.

Object

Representation ID: 1617

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Cowden

Housing survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook of 500 of the 750 households concluded 15 homes were needed not 4,200.

Houses should be developed south of Finham as local people said in previous consultations.

Brownfield sites should developed first, e.g. Coventry Airport, Arches Leamignton Spa, Ryton.

Develop 10 to 20 houses in each of the 22 villages in the District every 5 - 8 years.

Object

Representation ID: 1621

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stuart Sullivan

Why the old Peugeot site, now demolished, adjacent to the A45 between Ryton and Coventry Airpost, has not been considered for development within this process? The land is brownfield, adjacent to convenient link roads, within Warwickshire and nearer to its infastructure (Ryton is served by Warwickshire County Council). Such development would undoubtedly cause less irreversible environmental damage, indeed it could benefit the local environment, with inclusion of green spaces in any new development. Could the land value, and the benefits to Coventry and Warwickshire, financially, be less for such a site, rendering it less [financially] attractive?

Object

Representation ID: 1625

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Richard Hatton

Warwick University was encouraged to build more halls of residences these homes would be free for local residents.

Finham land should be reserved for WDC allocation not Coventry.

Housing market is already in a depressed state, building of more homes is only going to leave more functional homes empty.

Object

Representation ID: 1630

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

No. No. No. Just read the above regarding your (developers') choices.
NOTE
At a recent meeting at Guy's Hall, Warwick School, the Council Leader stated that these were "developers options." So what hope of an unbiased and democratic approach to future population growth and protection of existing standards of quality of life.

Object

Representation ID: 1637

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Roy & Maria Hirons

It would be better to build more halls of residence at Warwick University which would free up about 1000 houses in Leamington currently used for student accomodation. I understand there are a number of brown field sites that could be developed for housing to space green spaces.

Object

Representation ID: 1643

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Vanessa Hickerton

Consider the Whitnash community and look again at the options for building houses.

Seems easy to build on countryside yet there are so many empty buildings left unused. Only 75 on Fords but 200 next to Campion School and thousands in Whitnash. Queensway, Station Approach and the Peugeot site.

Object

Representation ID: 1656

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Elizabeth and Daniel Sheehan

Number of people: 2

Over 20 villages in the Warwick District could be included in small scale developments growing in a traditional, sustainable, organic fashion.

Build on brownfield sites, e.g. the ex Peugeot site. This could be an alternative to the Finham site.

Object

Representation ID: 1683

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1731

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Object

Object

Representation ID: 1760

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

There are several alternative sites that could and should be utilised:
Finham
Baginton
Thickthorn
North West Warwick

Support

Representation ID: 1819

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1846

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

As before need traffic impact survey etc. More traffic will worsen the air quality in the area,
Schools and health services in the area will be unable to cope with the number of new residents. 4200 residents, with, on average, 4 people in each, will mean an extra 17000 residents.

Object

Representation ID: 1909

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Miss K A Hattersley

New homes should be built within the district boundary at Finham and Burton Green. It is inappropriate to release land at Finham for Coventry's building requirements.
It is more appropriate to develop housing at Hatton Park and around other small pockets of land to spread the impact.

Object

Representation ID: 1919

Received: 14/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Cederic Box

Object - proposed housing should be located at alternative sites such as Finham, which was the preferred location of local people when asked in 2007/008.

There are at least 1000 houses in Leamington used for student accommodation. Students should be accommodated at Warwick University thus freeing up the properties, thereby requiring fewer houses to be built. Resutl: Less travel, less pollution.

Development could be spread around 22 villages in District - 10 to 15 houses every 1 years or so, so that by 2026 a significant number would be built.

Object

Representation ID: 1935

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

We do not want or can support 8000 new homes.

Object

Representation ID: 1978

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Ken Hope

(10.a) I can see no mention of developing more houses in the area off the Birmingham Raod from Warwick where the hospitals were (Hatton). The infrastructure particularly for transport is excellent in this area. I understood that space had been left for expansion here.

Object

Representation ID: 1990

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: K A Ferguson

On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodatehousing needs over the next 18 years.

Object

Representation ID: 2004

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: A. J Daubnley

On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses

proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of

life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodat housing needs over the next 18

years.

Object

Representation ID: 2015

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses

proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of

life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodat housing needs over the next 18

years.

Object

Representation ID: 2025

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: G Pritchard

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2054

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: mr john jacques

because it is based on biased unproven numbers provided by New Labour to suit own ends in getting relected, to get votes from mass of welfare dependent unemployed/unemployable hangers-on it has created in 11 years of mismanagement.

no because it has not consulted nor listened to views of local people affected.

Object

Representation ID: 2106

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: J Wenzel

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2114

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: B & N Blackham and Ellis

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in

the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2122

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2131

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: S P Jones

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in

the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.