Mod 14 - Policy DS15

Object

Representation ID: 69712

Received: 12/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. B. Singh

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- no evidence to support proposed park and ride with flood lighting and increased traffic
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69713

Received: 12/04/2016

Respondent: Harnek Singh

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- no evidence to support proposed park and ride with flood lighting and increased traffic
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69714

Received: 12/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Gurdev Singh

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- no evidence to support proposed park and ride with flood lighting and increased traffic
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69715

Received: 12/04/2016

Respondent: S. James

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- no evidence to support proposed park and ride with flood lighting and increased traffic
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69716

Received: 12/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Ross James

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- no evidence to support proposed park and ride with flood lighting and increased traffic
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69719

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Verena Kirchner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- no evidence to support proposed park and ride with flood lighting and increased traffic
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69721

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Deborah Brennan

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69723

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Tom Galea

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69724

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Jake Orga

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69725

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: John Lillie

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69726

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: L.E. Bradbury

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69728

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Jesse and Rebecca Ervin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69733

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Sport England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Clarification should be made in regards to the intended future of the sports club site (Alvis) at Kings Hill.

Object

Representation ID: 69740

Received: 12/04/2016

Respondent: Dr. Gurmit Swatt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69742

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: L. Johnson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69743

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Dr. Helen Metcalfe

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69746

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. David Llewelyn

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69747

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Jackie McLellan

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69748

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Antonia Stewart

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69749

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Nigel Johnson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69750

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: D Johnson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Object

Representation ID: 69812

Received: 14/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Sandra Lewis Hunt

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

- Green belt is preserved for environmental reasons - trees and plants, wildlife as well as pleasure and enjoyment.
- If natural environment is destroyed, children will not have wild places to learn about nature and wild life.
- Children will imitate the same and continue destroying the heritage.

Object

Representation ID: 69832

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

1. Revise DS15 in the light of our representations in Mod 10 by the omission of "including the former sewage works " in item a).
2. Reduce the area of land at Gallows Hill to that granted on appeal in item g) in the light of our representations in Mod 10
3. Why is the LPA not providing the overall masterplan across this part of the district for developers to take their part of the overall development to which they have to demonstrate that their proposal complies?

Object

Representation ID: 69851

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs J Mackenzie

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Allocations contrary to NPPF requirement to maintain separation, prevent coalescence
Numbers based on Coventry requirements not approved in local plan, revised before 2017?
No critical examination of claims that land unavailable -areas of Coventry green belt could be developed with less impact
Provision of land to meet Coventry's overspill contrary to NPPF - require sub-regional SA to be valid
How do proposals fit with neighbouring development
No consultation undertaken with parish councils before decisions made
MoU providing additional housing for Combined Authority circumvents democratic process, NPPF
Impact of proposals at Thickthorn and Kings Hill next to over-capacity A46 not considered

Object

Representation ID: 69884

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: David Hoare

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

-The area around Old Milverton is used by walkers, runners and cyclists.
-It will diminish the rural atmosphere which is of beneficial to the residents of Leamington and Warwick.

Object

Representation ID: 69888

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Suzanne Robbins

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposals: -
- No exceptional circumstances exist justifying removal of land from green belt.
- contrary to national and government policy
- alternative non-green belt sites available
- Kings Hill a better site
- will generate additional traffic, congestion
- adverse impacts on environment, character and appearance of area
- adverse impact on local facilities and services
- loss of recreational amenity
- sufficient five-year supply of housing land
- proposal for Park & Ride should be reviewed - no scheduled bus services.
- P&R will end up as car park
- in breach of human rights legislation

Object

Representation ID: 69903

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Lewis Stephenson

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The proposed development is to support the needs of Coventry City Council, not Leamington. There are sustainable sites closer to Coventry which would not involve extra commuting, congestion and road building. A railway station would be difficult to build. Most people who are in need of Coventry housing would not buy such houses. It would destroy the picturesque entrance to Leamington, together with its present wildlife and recreational use.

Object

Representation ID: 69915

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Christopher Trye

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

-The urban separation between Kenilworth and Leamington would be reduced to less than 1 1/2 miles. Much of the highly productive farmland would be lost together.
-There is no infrastructure to support development. Old Milverton Road, which has a difficult T-junction with Rugby road at one end would add to the congestion on the A452 at the blackdown roundabout at the other end.
-It has been suggested that the proposal would 'share the pain' to a degree with the developments on Non-Greenbelt land to the south of Leamington. This is not acceptable as a basis for planning policy.

Object

Representation ID: 69916

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Ms. I Walker

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Housing, road and transport development in the area of Old Milverton is not sound as it damages the character of the area which is attractive to local people for many reasons. The country walks, nature, freedom, cycling, exercise are all enjoyed at present and would be jeopardised by the proposed development.

Support

Representation ID: 69955

Received: 21/04/2016

Respondent: University of Warwick

Agent: Turley

The University notes the requirements placed on the development of the land south of Westwood Heath Road, adjoining the University campus, and the Kings Hill site east of the Gibbet Hill campus. The University strongly supports the provision of a new rail station.
The supporting text refers to the landowners/developers working together with the local authority as a full partner to ensure comprehensive development. The University strongly supports this, with cross reference to Policy DS NEW1 which specifically requires comprehensive longer-term planning of this area, taking account of the potential future growth of the University.