GT04 Land at Harbury Lane/Fosse Way (green)

Object

Representation ID: 64619

Received: 06/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Ellen Cook

The site os accessed from a dangerous road
Harbury Lane can flood in this area as can the site
Not aware of existing traveller sites that are well managed and which worked for neighbouring residents

Object

Representation ID: 64621

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mr John Milliken

The site should be discounted because of the following:-

-the detrimental impact it will have on the green belt
-lack of appropriate infrastructure provision for the site
-the site will be subject to contamination/ noise factors

Object

Representation ID: 64624

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Jane Haggitt

This site should not go forwards as a G and T site because:-
-It has poor access to schools and doctors surgeries (social infrastructure)
-there is a considerable distance to schools , doctors and shops / services
-the site is a valued football club location that was the fruit of much effort/ investment by volunteers and businesses (this must be respected)

Object

Representation ID: 64626

Received: 09/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Diana Spall

Experience gained from Buckinghamshire has shown that G and T's ofen abuse these sites leaving a 'clear-up' operation costing the taxpayer a lot of money.
Having now chosen to live in Harbury it would be a shame to see the locality spoiled by the development of this G and T proposal.

Object

Representation ID: 64627

Received: 09/05/2014

Respondent: Mr Ronald Spall

Objects to this site because of the following:-
Impact on the landscape
Infrastructure requirements will not be adequately met
Impact on the visual amenity of the area
Poor access to the local road network
innability to provide safe access to / from the site
Distance to GP surgeries, schools, dentists, hospitals, shops and community facilities
deliverability of the site
proximity to other residential properties

Object

Representation ID: 64628

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mr Robin Davis

The site should not go forwards to implementation because of the following:-
- there is a lack of services (access to education , and health facilities)
-The Fosseway is a dangerous road and access to the site will be dangerous
-the site is in proximity of other residential properties and will have a negative impact upon them.

Object

Representation ID: 64629

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Shiela Malin

The site should not be considered because:-
Access will be difficult/ dangerous for this site
The Fosseway is fast with frequent accidents

Object

Representation ID: 64630

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mr David Malin

The site is near a dangerous junction on the Fosseway which is already overwhelmed with trafic at peak periods.
Local doctors and schools will not be able to cope (are already over subscribed)
The site will not be capable of being screned , having a negative impact on the surrounding area/ views.

Object

Representation ID: 64631

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Nora Ellis

This site site should be discounted because-
- it has no mains sewage infrastructure
-it is adjacent to the high pressure gas main in the locality
-It is adjacent the Harbury Lane/ Fosseway accident blackspot
-the Local GP surgery will not be able to cater for additional patients as a consequence of this G and T site.

Object

Representation ID: 64632

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mr Phillip Underhill

Doctors and schools will not be able to cope with this development
There is too much traffic on the roads without additional traffic from this site

Object

Representation ID: 64633

Received: 06/05/2014

Respondent: Mr Brian Haggitt

This site should not be used because -
-The site is well used as a football club
-Local infrastructure would not be able to suport this facility (eg health / education)
-Harbury Lane and the Fosseway are both fast / dangerous roads

Object

Representation ID: 64634

Received: 06/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Claire O'keeffe

-The site is currently well usesd and a key part of the local community
- There is insufficient infrastructure / local facilities

Object

Representation ID: 64635

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Philippa Wallington

Objects to this proposal

Object

Representation ID: 64636

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Malone

The site wil require school places at Harbury and Bishops Itchington school both of which are having capacity issues.
Similarly there is concern that there are innadequate provisions for doctors, shops and services in the Stratford District Villages therefore this development would not be sustainable.

Object

Representation ID: 64637

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Briony Village

Sxchools and doctors serving this site wil be in Stratford District and difficult to access. These facilities are already busy / overburdened.
It is wrong for the travellers to have to rely on shops etc at Harbury.

Object

Representation ID: 64638

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Joan Stephenson

Objects because
negative impact on village school / doctors surgery (already over subscribed)
impact on views from Chesterton Windmill
Site has tendency to flood
The site is too remote from facilities and services
There are no footpaths from the site / danger for pedestrians
The site has no infrastructure provision
the land is presently used by a football club
The site would require expensive compulsory purchase

Object

Representation ID: 64639

Received: 06/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Ann Mayer

Objects because of the following:-
traffic congestion
site has poor access to infrastructure doctors, schools etc
negative impact on local landscape
loss of good agricultural land
concerns that the site would become littered / an eyesore

Object

Representation ID: 64645

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Lucy Caroline Bolton

-There is no safe access here as it near the Fosseway crossroads (accident blackspot)
-No pavements means no safe access for pedestrians can be made
-No school or GP surgery within a 10 minute walking time
-Harbury School and doctors are already full to capacity
-The site is too close to other residential properties

Object

Representation ID: 64646

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mr Craig Anthony Bolton

negative impact on Harbury village school / doctors surgery (already over subscribed)
site too close to residential properties
The site is too remote from facilities and services
There are no footpaths from the site / danger for pedestrians

Object

Representation ID: 64669

Received: 07/05/2014

Respondent: Miss Kathryn Draper

Adverse impact on property prices.

Road is already busy without increasing traffic levels further.

It will be unsightly.

Will increase concerns about crime.

Will increase demand for GP services etc and could stop local children getting their preferred choice of school.

Should be located away from towns and villages.

Object

Representation ID: 64672

Received: 02/05/2014

Respondent: Humphrey & Margaret Collis

Not clear why such a site is required.

Proposal will impact on green belt, landscape character and heritage assets.

Such sites have an adverse impact on the character, viability and amenity of an area.

Will Council tax payer be granted a reduction?

Object

Representation ID: 64699

Received: 09/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Amber Soomro

The local GP surgery at Harbury is full, as are the nearest junior and secondary schools.
The site is in a flood plain. The road outside the football club is always flooding resulting in hazardous driving conditions.
The site is close to a dangerous highway junction known for serious / fatal accidents, and the increase in traffic from the G&T site would increase the risk of accidents.
Developing the site will damage wildlife.
The site is near to a farm and would not be a good place to live due to bad smells.
The site is prone to noise pollution from Harbury Lane breakers.

Object

Representation ID: 64701

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mr Karm Soomro

GT04 does not meet the fundamental planning criteria in the NPPF because:
- lacks access to shops and local services
- is on community periphery and so does not encourage integration
- local schools and GP surgeries are full to capacity and so do not offer such services
- limited access to local transport
- developing the site will damage wildlife
- the site is prone to flooding and will not enable appropriate drainage
- the flooding causes hazardous conditions on Harbury Lane and so will increase the risk of accidents
- the Fosse Way junction is high risk for accidents and so the increase in traffic would put lives at risk
- The site is not cost effective to develop and relocate football club, e.g. building homes plus 5-10 permanent pitches which cost between £325k to £650k.

Object

Representation ID: 64711

Received: 27/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Gillian Stephens

GP practices and schools will be overstretched.
Increased traffic.
Flooding down Harbury Lane an issue.
No pavements for pedestrians.
Concerns over football club.
Refuse disposal on site.
Cost of refuse disposal.

Object

Representation ID: 64725

Received: 07/05/2014

Respondent: Mr John Dickerson

1) Primary school already full
2) Doctors already over-subscribed
3) A complete waste of money to move an established football ground to another site - put this gypsy site there.

Object

Representation ID: 64727

Received: 07/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Bridget Burnham

Site being close to Fosse Way should rule it out as there are so many accidents at the 'Bendigo cross roads' already make this exit from Harbury a no go for many residents.

Access to and from this proposed site will add to the volume of traffic at this junction, already busy when traffic travelling to and from Gaydon builds up.

The local school is full and it is difficult to get an appointment at the local surgery. Most of the suggested criteria make this site totally unsuitable.

Object

Representation ID: 64731

Received: 08/05/2014

Respondent: Mr Brian Hill

After losing the Windmill site it took the football club years to find a new site. It is an act of vandalism to eject them for this site if a suitable new site can be found the Council must reimburse the Club for cost of euqipping their site.
The cross road on the Fosse Way is already dangerous. Traffic lights would have to be installed.
Harbury surgery, schools and community facilities would be overloaded.

Object

Representation ID: 64734

Received: 06/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Kathleen Ellis

There has been a catalogue of accidents at the very busy junction on the Fosse Way at junction Harbury Lane. This site with trailers being towed would only add to this problem. The criteria listed are all relevant in this case. Surely travelling means moving - so temporary not permanent so no need for facilities such as these.

Object

Representation ID: 64741

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Ms Georgina Edwards

Schools in Harbury and Bishops Itchington are oversubscribed. The Fosse way is extremely busy and difficult to cross. Doctors surgery in Harbury is full. Site would need to be totally secure for children and animals. Local convenience stores could be subject to greater congestion if they need to serve a wider group of people.

Object

Representation ID: 64752

Received: 05/05/2014

Respondent: Mr & Mrs William & Margaret Middleton

Impact on landscape character and heritage assets (Chesterton Mill and Roman Site). Difficult to meet infrastructure requirements. Agricultural land. Access to road network. Distance to GP surgeries, schools etc. Safe access to and from site