Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the Historic Environment?

Object

Representation ID: 33590

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ray Bullen

When considering Historic Environment have regard to 21st century - as much part of history as any other. Considerable danger opportunities don't happen because of conservation.
Has to be balance although recognize that unless conservation policy has teeth, nothing will be conserved. Also avoid danger that conservationists of future don't look back and say human development stopped in 20th century.
In conservation areas any development should respect and add to quality of area and adjacent buildings but without trying to mimic/copy old. Needs to be seen as a natural development, being a further step in history of case.

Object

Representation ID: 33591

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ray Bullen

Options say enhance means mimic. Wrong if that's what it means. Working on old structure, then of course is essential to replicate work in form/nature of original, but where old building in very poor condition, or is poor original visual quality, is indistinctive, one of many, badly located for today's needs and prevents essential developments for people that live there today, then romantic retention should not occur.
Conservation of buildings is one thing, but conservation of planet is problem. If we don't solve that then buildings we want to conserve won't survive. With so many listed buildings, energy consumption and CO2 production is huge.

Support

Representation ID: 33690

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr T Steele

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Support

Object

Representation ID: 33736

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Sharba Homes

Agent: PJPlanning

The choice is not between confrontation and partnership, national guidance needs to be applied sensitively and appropriately.

Support

Representation ID: 33774

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Shirley Estates

Agent: Davis Planning Partnership

Agree an SPG suitable for detailed advice.

Comment

Representation ID: 33801

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Historic England

Broadly welcome thoughtful and considered response to District's significant historic
environment and how this might be reflected in Local Development Framework and how
associated vision and objectives can be delivered.
Comments intended to guide further iteration of strategy to enable positive commitment to historic environment to be effectively delivered; national and regional historic environment policy to be addressed and tests of soundness satisfied.

Comment

Representation ID: 33802

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Historic England

Evidence base
English Heritage recommends Core Strategy demonstrate it has taken full account of
potential effects which alternative courses of action might have upon historic environment.
To inform spatial strategy we note preparation and consideration of Joint Green Belt
Review and Landscape Character Assessment for South Warwick and Leamington Spa, however also note that before principle of strategic sites is determined and identified in Submission version further essential work required to ensure a robust and justifiable
approach is pursued.

Comment

Representation ID: 33804

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Historic England

Refer to aforementioned studies and recommendations of authors. In turn strongly
suggest you discuss with County Council how points can best be addressed
Joint Green Belt Review
5.0 Report Findings
5.1 Overview
5.1.1 Purpose of this section is to outline findings of the study and detail parcels within the study area that have been identified as least constrained and which four Local Authorities
can analyse further through individual Core Strategies for potential provision of future
development.
5.4.2 Having undergone detailed analysis, there will be a range of other factors that will need to
be considered at local level, which may contribute to identifying sites within parcels for
possible allocation within Core Strategies.
5.4.3 In order to provide a finer grained, more detailed analysis of parcels to identify specific sites for future development factors for consideration should include: Archaeological

Comment

Representation ID: 33805

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Historic England

Constraints; Character & setting; and Historic Landscape Character Analysis.
English Heritage also suggests consideration of known and unknown (but likely) archaeology; listed buildings; setting concerns and key views (in and out); and the emerging Warwickshire historic farmsteads work.

Comment

Representation ID: 33806

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Historic England

6.2 Recommendations
6.2.1 Purpose of study was to identify parcels of land that individual Local Authorities
could examine in greater detail through Core Strategies in order to identify sites to accommodate residential and employment development in line with Regional Spatial Strategy for the West Midlands.
6.2.2 Recommended that parcels detailed within Tables 5 and 6, and represented within
Figures 9.1 to 9.5 within Appendix 14, be investigated further in order to identify specific sites for future development.
.

Comment

Representation ID: 33807

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Historic England

Landscape Character Assessment for Land South of Warwick and Leamington, February
2009
4.0 Information gathered
4.1 Any historical or cultural information about site that has been available through brief internet
research. We recommend further work undertaken. Warwickshire Historic landscape
characterisation project may assist this research.
Green infrastructure
English Heritage supports preparation of green infrastructure strategy to coordinate effective
management of change to natural and historic environment particularly in margins of
settlements in district likely to witness significant change.

Comment

Representation ID: 33808

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Historic England

Place
Setting and integrity of Warwick's towns and villages can be seriously affected by insensitive
infrastructure or highway initiatives. Core Strategy should emphasise importance of high
quality public realm and street design and promote a commitment to it. The variety of national good practice guidance issued provides means to inform delivery of high quality places and spaces.

Comment

Representation ID: 33809

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Historic England

Building for Life criteria
English Heritage supports application of CABE's Building for Life criteria, an effective tool to
promote and judge relative design quality of development proposals.
Heritage @ Risk
Preferred approach advocated for historic environment refers to focussed promotion of
good practice to owners and occupiers. You may also wish to refer to a commitment to seek to address historic assets within District on national Heritage @ Risk register (currently six).
Warwickshire Extensive Urban Survey and

Comment

Representation ID: 33810

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Historic England

Historic Landscape Characterisation
The Warwickshire Historic Landscape Characterisation (HLC) is now complete and extensive urban survey of key settlements is due to commence shortly. The Core Strategy should acknowledge HLC in schedule of evidence, apply it to inform spatial strategy as and determine how it should be applied in future. The Extensive Urban Survey will provide important contextual information to guide future change. County will be leading the project and may advise how best it can be acknowledged in the Local Development

Comment

Representation ID: 33811

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Historic England

Framework.
Landscape Character Assessment for Land South of Warwick and Leamington, February
2009
5.1 Warwick and Leamington Spa have highly-valued historic cores and Warwick Castle and the
associated Castle Park have national heritage significance. Protecting setting of these features
must be considered a principal goal of future development planning in locality. In addition and
particularly as towns are important tourist destinations, quality of approaches to town
should be considered in all development planning. A combination of protection of landscape assets and enhancement or removal of landscape detractors should be considered in strategic planning.

Comment

Representation ID: 33812

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Historic England

This important statement in your recent study provides a useful prompt to focus spatial improvements to, for example, setting and approaches to key settlements (not just the big 3) and address eyesores (landscape detractors) within District. Such incidents and means to address them could be identified and considered as part of proposed historic environment SPD

Support

Representation ID: 33839

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33938

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Kenilworth Town Council

Supports options