Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the Historic Environment?

Object

Representation ID: 4354

Received: 25/08/2009

Respondent: Dominic Simpson

Loss of views toward Warwick and castle across countryside.

Support

Representation ID: 4381

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: A Picken

Support

Support

Representation ID: 4452

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

support

Object

Representation ID: 4549

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Taberner

Object to Kings Hill site:
Site is of national historical importance
Site is of international historical interest
Site could be utilised at later date by future generations to improve social standing and public image of Coventry
Site, if developed for housing, would prevent future generations from capitalising on historical importance of city centre in Coventry and sites associated with modern, mediaeval, Norman and Saxon history.

Support

Representation ID: 4559

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Support

Representation ID: 4628

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Support

Representation ID: 4629

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Object

Representation ID: 4681

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Miremadi

Object to sites at:
Lower Heathcote Farm south of Harbury Lane
Land south of Sydenham and east of Whitnash
Land at Woodside Farm, north of Harbury Lane
Land west of Europa Way
Historic area and evidence would be lost forever.

Support

Representation ID: 4724

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

support

Object

Representation ID: 4795

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: richard keylock

NO.

Support

Representation ID: 4893

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 4992

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs P E Hunt

Object to sites at Bishops Tachbrook/Warwick Gates:
Ancient buildings of Warwick - important to preserve our history. Traffic pollution causes irreparable damage.
Ancient bridges - inevitable damage from increased traffic.

Support

Representation ID: 5002

Received: 08/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

Support

Object

Representation ID: 5068

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

It seems to me that this covers only historic sites in towns. There is plenty of sites of historic interest in the green belt around Kenilworth - e.g. The Pleasance accessed via Purlieu Lane.

Support

Representation ID: 5168

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

You have a good policy, but what is the point of keeping some historic buildings if the Council wants to destroy the historic town.

Object

Representation ID: 5232

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 5267

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

Yes

Support

Representation ID: 5306

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

A compromise needs to be found whereby Article Four Directions are applied sensitively with real consideration of the real needs and impacts of individual cases.

Object

Representation ID: 5361

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

No detail is provided in the Core Strategy Preferred Options Paper

Support

Representation ID: 5413

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5453

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

The options should include the balanced approach.

Object

Representation ID: 5487

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Illingworth

Historic landscapes and settlement patterns deserve more than a passing mention

Support

Representation ID: 5546

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5591

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5675

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5724

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

I agree that 'protecting the historic environment [is] a high priority'.

Support

Representation ID: 5785

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Yes agree you have identified all reasonable options

Support

Representation ID: 5826

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5864

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5942

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Protecting the historic environment should not be lead by commercial gain. Financial support should be given by other means. the landscape policies for protecting historic building should be retained i.e views in an out (DAP4 DAP8).