Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the Historic Environment?

Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 138

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2087

Received: 05/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Kerr

Representation Summary:

The protection of our historic heritage is imprtant to give the people of Warwick District a 'sense of history' and the inclusion of 'open spaces' of historic interest is just as important as historic 'buildings'. The extension of 'Conservation Areas' to cover all historical 'open spaces' should be considered. Particularly those owned by WDC as the freeholder.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2195

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2344

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2456

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2515

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: British Waterways

Representation Summary:

Historic canals not are included within Conservation Areas in Warwick District. This key industrial heritage is an integral part of the landscape within the countryside surrounding villages and towns. Kingswood Junction/Lapworth locks and the Hatton Lock flight are renown features of the canal system.

WDC should consider the possibility of conservation area designation for the South Stratford and Grand Union Canals with other LPAs. The intrinsic value of the canal and its historic buildings are irreplaceable assets. Careful conservation management of the canals will ensure the preservation of historic buildings, structures and textures and control development along the corridor.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2573

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2651

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Representation Summary:

Support.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2701

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Representation Summary:

This is the bedrock of Leamington's appeal and tourist appeal. The Planning Dept. should be far more pro-active where large developments especially Council ones are planned - never again should a Brandon House be permitted.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2766

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Representation Summary:

Maintaing the historic treasures is hugely important for our sense of history and for the tourist industry.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2809

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Representation Summary:

If we want tourists to come to this area, we must protect its beauty and its important historical attractions.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2818

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Graham A. Reynolds

Representation Summary:

Kingshill is an area of interest with two lost medieval villages. Ancient hedges and trees which feature on 15th century maps.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2853

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2891

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3107

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3240

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

Representation Summary:

lovely historic area
please preserve

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3293

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

Representation Summary:

I support it.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3318

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Caroline Martin

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3346

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3414

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3490

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs E. Appleby

Representation Summary:

The Kings Hill area contains Ancient Woodland and hedgerows and should not be developed.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3585

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

Representation Summary:

object

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3721

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Representation Summary:

Supported.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3760

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3761

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3783

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Carol Pritchard

Representation Summary:

Acknowledged constraints: scheduled ancient monument, regionally important geological site, flood risk zones, undulating land, noise from A46 and railway line, impact on area of medium and high landscape value.
Kings Hill historic area with links to Stoneleigh Abbey: ancient hedgerows, diverse wildlife.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3890

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Patricia Diane Freeman

Representation Summary:

No. The Council should have tried much harder to save many historical fields in the past.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4083

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

Representation Summary:

Preserving historic environment is of great importance to this area as it brings in tourism and I support the need to preserve listed buildings etc

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4097

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Keith Turfrey

Representation Summary:

In the Kenilworth strategy there are ancient woodlands in a conservation area. It is strange that on asking their views on this strategy that they had not been consulted and were unaware of this potential threat to the Glasshouse Spinney and Rocky Lane.

Plenty of fine words wrapped in Goobly Gook to confuse residents

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4103

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Representation Summary:

Everything possible should be done to protect this huge asset.This should include open spaces as well as buildings.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4155

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Woodland Trust

Representation Summary:

We are pleased to see the reference (paragraphs 16.2 & 16.3) to Parklands and Ancient Woodland, although the latter is also a crucial habitat for section 17 - Natural Environment. However we would also like to see ancient/veteran/notable trees considered within this section and protected as green monuments.