Do you support or object to the preferred option for Open Space?

Support

Representation ID: 4620

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Support

Representation ID: 4717

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

support

Object

Representation ID: 4838

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr. Andrew Clarke

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 4887

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 4986

Received: 08/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

NO - The options are not confined to how contributions will be sought. There are also options (or should be) about what infrastructure will be needed especially in relation to the new development areas. Without the infrastructure Delivery Plan, it is impossible to reach a reasoned response to any of the proposed development areas and THIS IS A MAJOR WEAKNESS OF THE PREFERRED OPTION CONSULTATION.

Support

Representation ID: 5062

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5158

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

Only very small development should be allowed. Brown field/Rejuvenation is the only socially and environmental way to go.

Object

Representation ID: 5225

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 5257

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

Policies in direct conflict with each other.

Support

Representation ID: 5295

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

This is largely constrained by national policy and in any case requires further work.

Object

Representation ID: 5355

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

No detail is provided in the Core Strategy Preferred Options Paper

Support

Representation ID: 5407

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5447

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

these cannot be treated as a separate and parallel process.

Support

Representation ID: 5484

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Illingworth

I hope that it will be applied to development in Kenilworth where provision for publicly accessible open space is below the District average. It is particularly low in the Thickthorn area.

Support

Representation ID: 5539

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5584

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5670

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5717

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5779

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

The plans don't show as a percentage of space 40% of the residents wishes to protect open spaces including play areas, sports pitches, allotments. This must be seen along with housing space, employment space as green space and shown in the plan. It's vital for the local community to be given an opportunity to get into the fresh air, enjoy the healthy benefits from growing and eating own food. Leamington has over 200 people on allotment waiting lists imagine what 10,800 homes would add to these lists.

Support

Representation ID: 5822

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

But the Council already proposes to disregard its existing open space (e.g. West of Europa Way).

Support

Representation ID: 5936

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

But 12.8 details needs to be known.

Support

Representation ID: 6038

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 6087

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Skidmore

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 6139

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow

Number of people: 2

Object

Object

Representation ID: 6215

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Object

Support

Representation ID: 6278

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Support

Object

Representation ID: 6360

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 6456

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

Object

Comment

Representation ID: 6721

Received: 05/11/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council - Heritage & Culture (Museums)

It would be helpful if there were acknowledgement at 12.1 that open space can support conservation of the historic environment as well as the natural environment.
It is suggested that this Open Space Strategic Objective should also reference the SCS Strategic Aim relating to the Natural Environment with the following inclusions
Para 12.1 to include "Green Corridors" that will bring wildlife into the urban environments.
Para 12.4 the inclIusion of the Habitat Biodiversity Audit and the Wildlife Sites Partnership datasets as evidence bases and a statement that these will include areas of open space and be potential monitoring tools.

Support

Representation ID: 6741

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

Glad to see that allotment land is given a mention, especially as there is a big demand for allotments, shown by the waiting lists held by existing allotment societies.