Do you support or object to the preferred option for Open Space?

Support

Representation ID: 2081

Received: 05/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Kerr

The 'Preferred Option' should also include the stated objective of propecting existing 'open spaces' of historical or environmental interest from intrusive development. Also, declaring any such open spaces as Conservation Areas couls assist in offering them some protection.

Object

Representation ID: 2334

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2411

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

No.

Object

Representation ID: 2450

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 2499

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: British Waterways

Yes

Object

Representation ID: 2567

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Removal of green belt contradicts this. All infrastructure/open space plans are as yet undefined.

Support

Representation ID: 2645

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2760

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

As long as green spaces are created proportionate to the amount of housing being created.

Object

Representation ID: 2804

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

This is where your objectives clash with one another.

Object

Representation ID: 2847

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2886

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 2947

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Support but would have wished to have seen more details of the standards which will be set.

Object

Representation ID: 3000

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Have no confidence in the planners, just take a look at Coventry's Fairfax Street, Sports centre it's worse than a third world country's, no wonder so many people boycott it.

Object

Representation ID: 3102

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Object

Support

Representation ID: 3183

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

Support but would have wished to have seen more details of the standards which will be set.

Support

Representation ID: 3233

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

if any housing development goes ahead then open space must be preserved

Support

Representation ID: 3287

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

I support it.

Support

Representation ID: 3336

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3408

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

But I think there are already plenty of amenities available in WDC if some people could be bothered to look for them, and use them!

Object

Representation ID: 3487

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs E. Appleby

Kings Hill area is open space which includes access to the Wainbody Wood can and is enjoyed by many people and should be left undeveloped as a natural area.

Object

Representation ID: 3575

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

object

Object

Representation ID: 3613

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Sport England

The principals are laudable but cannot be delivered until the full details of PPG 17 assessment has been analysed and fed into a robust strategy.

Object

Representation ID: 3679

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Keay

Loss of green belt space in an already congested part of the Mdlands is unacceptable.

Support

Representation ID: 3754

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3994

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr M Abba

This seems at odds with the development strategies to build on current open green space.

Support

Representation ID: 4092

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

A statement that doesn't really allow challenge.

Object

Representation ID: 4204

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

Green areas should be identified "up front" and not after more deliberation. I am disappointed at the lack of planning and the short time period allowed for consultation

Support

Representation ID: 4378

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: A Picken

Support

Support

Representation ID: 4446

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

support

Support

Representation ID: 4553

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support