Do you support or object to the preferred option for Open Space?

Showing comments and forms 91 to 101 of 101

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6955

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Open Space
The Parish Council does not support the Preferred Option. The Parish Council believes that in identifying potential development sites, as well as identifying the number of dwellings that will be accommodated, there should be a stipulation of the minimum Open Space allocation as a percentage of area.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7013

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

More information is required to see what this option means

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7394

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Europa Way Consortium

Agent: Entec UK Ltd

Representation Summary:

The Consortium supports the development of an infrastructure delivery plan but would not want to see the delivery of Phase 1 strategic sites inhibited whilst this is being prepared.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7588

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Mr George Jones

Representation Summary:

Object

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7668

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Forrester of Loes Farm, Guys Cliffe

Agent: Barlow Associates Limited

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7730

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ray Bullen

Representation Summary:

If the words in the document mean we "will work it out later", no comment can be made at this stage. Except that, it is poor planning policy to expand residential of the district by 20% without simultaneously including the open space needs, properly thought through as to level of requirements and integrating it with the residential development so that it happens and is available when occupation begins.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33626

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Representation Summary:

Clarification is requested on the relationship with the existing SPD.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33685

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr T Steele

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33770

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Shirley Estates

Agent: Davis Planning Partnership

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33832

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Representation Summary:

A new linear park linking sites to the south of Harbury Lane with Castle Park is potentially important element.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33887

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Representation Summary:

The current approach to open space provision is unworkable.