Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Infrastructure?
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4085
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke
Hard to verify actual housing needs because of constantly changing demographics. Planning should not be subject to Central Government predictions, but based on local need and knowledge.
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4107
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Jerry Woodhouse
it is important that the infrastructure is in place or planned inadvance of the housing developments
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4119
Received: 11/09/2009
Respondent: Colin Sharp
No assessment made of infrastructure requirements - impact on overfull roads, provision of water and sewerage treatment works, medical/hospital and schooling requirements, flood risk. Council should insist on extension of at least six months to consultation period during which time infrastructure reports should be commissioned.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4130
Received: 11/09/2009
Respondent: A D Fryer
Object to Kings Hill site
Road access too narrow
Shops nearly all closed (too expensive) Mining from Coventry Colliery and Daw Mill towards Kenilworth.
New Coventry sewer complex under Kings Hill. Flooding from Finham Brook. Green belt must be retained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4134
Received: 03/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs A Dobson
Object to Kings Hill site
Local infrastructure could not cope - schools, doctors, dentists.
Parking outside school at maximim and couldn't cope with more places.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4142
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Andy Robb
You haven't considered any options. You have just blithely said - we will have a plan. This is not good enough.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4149
Received: 11/09/2009
Respondent: Miss C E Hattersley
No account taken of infrastructure and provision of offices and factories for employment.
Further land will be needed for schools, sports fields and other leisure facilities, shops, surgeries, churches, car parking (inc. a park and ride scheme to replace the one at Europa Way). Also utilities, sewage and flood prevention from greatly increased urban footprint. What consultation has taken place with Severn Trent etc?
No travel impact survey undertaken - number of new vehicles likely, to further detriment of air quality.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4164
Received: 09/09/2009
Respondent: Elizabeth Heigl
Utilities, services - police, doctors, dentists etc all overstretched now. Hospitals only accessible via bridges over Avon and fear for emergency cases reaching assistance.
Huge increase in traffic will result in pollution and air quality problems in Warwick and Leamington town centres. At peak times, traffic gridlocked along roads to M40.
Reduced employment since demise of AP, Fords, IBM and work not available for incomers. People commute elsewhere to work, especially at Warwick Gates.
Remaining agricultural land needed to feed future generations.
Why decision not to build new settlement below A46/J15 interchange where direct road links available.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4170
Received: 09/09/2009
Respondent: A J Bryan
Infrastructure. Traffic already queuing trying to exit Birches Lane to St John's Island - can only get worse.
A452 to Leamington one of the busiest single carriageway roads in Warwickshire - plans abandoned to 'dual' it.
Railway cuts through Kenilworth - access to town centre or from town centre to Warwick and Birmingham must find way over line. Results in lots of traffic using bridges.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4200
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Onkar Mann
There has been insufficient consideration of infrastructure requirements and the existing infrastructure could be used more effectively if new development was spread more evenly throughout the district. The plans need to be re-considered.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4221
Received: 14/09/2009
Respondent: Rev. J.G. Lister
No provision for new roads and infrastructure - how would people feed onto road system. Warwick bridge cannot take more and Myton Road is solid.
Where would children go to school? Where is extra health provision? Where will people find work? or will people commute, making area dormitory town without sense of community or soul?
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4268
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Kulwinder Fathers
Infrastructure i.e. water, roads and schools etc. are already overstretched in Whitnash, South Leamington, South Warwick, Heathcote & Bishops Tachbrook. This has not been considered in the proposed development within the core strategy.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4282
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Lorraine J Gowing
Object to Kings Hill site:
Local roads inadequate to accommodate massive increase in traffic leading to congestion and pollution.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4286
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr M G Miles
Object to Kings Hill site:
A severe lack of infrastructure to support network of housing.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4289
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: H R Anderson
Object to Thickthorn site:
Town lacks resources to cater for so many new residents. Extra traffic
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4292
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Miles
Object to Kings Hill site:
Lack of transport and infrastructure
Lack of support - doctors, dentists, schools
Drainage issues and supply of water
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4298
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Heather Cooper
Object to Kings Hill site:
Road system could not cope with extra traffic. A45 would be gridlocked at peak times.
Amenities, facilities and services
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4304
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs J Wade
Object to Kings Hill site:
Unemployment set to rise, where are the jobs?
Road congestion will increase.
.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4309
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Anne S Statham
Object to Kings Hill site:
Lack of infrastructure, roads, drains, sewers, schools, health centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4317
Received: 31/07/2009
Respondent: Mr Trevor E Wood
No impact plan commissioned.
No consideration given to:
Schools, children from same families go to different schools typically opposing travel/traffic strategy
Police - crime increased since Warwick Gates developed
Dentists
Doctors
Road access - congestion. Bridge to Warwick and Leamington bottlenecks, M40 backs up to Longbridge Island in morning.
Services/utilities - already stretched to limit
Leisure facilities - built to placate residents when Warwick Gates built but are poorly utilised, inaccessible, incomplete
Flora and fauna - currently woodpeckers, muntjacks, foxes and many wild birds which would be compromised if Woodsite Farm site was developed.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4326
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Roy Standley
Expressed views about increased traffic when Warwick Gates built - nothing done. Results in stationary traffic on M40 queuing to access Leamington and Warwick at peak periods.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4330
Received: 18/09/2009
Respondent: Janette Eslick
Concerned area around Europa Way impact on traffic, increase in flood risk on land currently acts as soakaway and is rich habitat for wildlife.
Traffic - south of Warwick already at saturation with Myton Road virtually impassable at peak times. No capacity for more cars. Detrimental to residents and tourism.
Increased risk of flooding - at present run off is slowed by pasture and crops. Development results in flooding of houses.
Loss of habitat - impact on woodpeckers, buzzards, bats, foxes, deer, newts and hedgehogs.
Impact on infrastructure - strain on local services; GP surgeries, hospital, drainage, sewerage and public transport.
Local school capacity - schools oversubscribed. Problems arose when Warwick Gates developed without new school..
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4336
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Janet Davis
Object to 800 houses on Thickthorn. Infrastructure required. Additional traffic will alter whole concept of area.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4341
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Clive Letchford
Location on edge of town and problems of transport - lack of effective public transport and increasing car congestion
Burden on services, police, health and education
Lack of indication of where people will be employed - already significant numbers of commuters
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4350
Received: 25/08/2009
Respondent: Dominic Simpson
Worried that increase in housing is not balanced by infrastructure required to cope with increased traffic, utilities, schools and services. Needs to be in place before development built as problems in past with water supply and school place provision.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4367
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Michael Kirby
No mention of enhancing infrastructure - police, health, schools, sewerage etc.
Village already escape route for traffic from principal feeder roads.
Village on verge of urban encapsulation by triangle of roads to Warwick, Leamington, and M40.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4377
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: A Picken
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4384
Received: 19/08/2009
Respondent: Daniel & Elizabeth Sheethan
If developments were to go ahead, new pinch points created by bridges crossing canals and rivers.
Council has highlighted unacceptable traffic congestion but now seems to be commending 'good communications network'
New building would lack school, medical, leisure and sports facilities.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4393
Received: 26/08/2009
Respondent: R.F. Garner
Traffic will increase causing problems on already overcrowded routes. Quality of life in rural areas will deteriorate with no compensating benefits for local people.
Infrastructure - Already stretched due in part to lack of facilities at Warwick Gates. No assurances about new resources: police, medical, schools, shops, leisure facilities, parks, will be provided - likley to be woefully inadequate.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4406
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Mr R.L.K. Drew
Roads already congested and often approach gridlock if there is an accident. Concerns about effect on some historic buildings from vibrations caused by heavy traffic. Most new households would have at least one car - how will traffic keep moving? What plans for dealing with increased pollution and deterioration in air quality in towns and increased deterioration in road surfaces.
Bishops Tachbrook is already used as rat run by commuters avoiding Europa Way - particularly dangerous to school children. What measures proposed to prevent this and reduce risk to villagers.
Rivers form physical obstacles to traffic movement. Increase in population south of river, remote from emergency services, seems unwise.