Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Infrastructure?

Showing comments and forms 121 to 150 of 1594

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4085

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Representation Summary:

Hard to verify actual housing needs because of constantly changing demographics. Planning should not be subject to Central Government predictions, but based on local need and knowledge.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4107

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Jerry Woodhouse

Representation Summary:

it is important that the infrastructure is in place or planned inadvance of the housing developments

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4119

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Colin Sharp

Representation Summary:

No assessment made of infrastructure requirements - impact on overfull roads, provision of water and sewerage treatment works, medical/hospital and schooling requirements, flood risk. Council should insist on extension of at least six months to consultation period during which time infrastructure reports should be commissioned.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4130

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: A D Fryer

Representation Summary:

Object to Kings Hill site
Road access too narrow
Shops nearly all closed (too expensive) Mining from Coventry Colliery and Daw Mill towards Kenilworth.
New Coventry sewer complex under Kings Hill. Flooding from Finham Brook. Green belt must be retained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4134

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs A Dobson

Representation Summary:

Object to Kings Hill site
Local infrastructure could not cope - schools, doctors, dentists.
Parking outside school at maximim and couldn't cope with more places.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4142

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Andy Robb

Representation Summary:

You haven't considered any options. You have just blithely said - we will have a plan. This is not good enough.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4149

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Miss C E Hattersley

Representation Summary:

No account taken of infrastructure and provision of offices and factories for employment.
Further land will be needed for schools, sports fields and other leisure facilities, shops, surgeries, churches, car parking (inc. a park and ride scheme to replace the one at Europa Way). Also utilities, sewage and flood prevention from greatly increased urban footprint. What consultation has taken place with Severn Trent etc?
No travel impact survey undertaken - number of new vehicles likely, to further detriment of air quality.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4164

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Elizabeth Heigl

Representation Summary:

Utilities, services - police, doctors, dentists etc all overstretched now. Hospitals only accessible via bridges over Avon and fear for emergency cases reaching assistance.
Huge increase in traffic will result in pollution and air quality problems in Warwick and Leamington town centres. At peak times, traffic gridlocked along roads to M40.
Reduced employment since demise of AP, Fords, IBM and work not available for incomers. People commute elsewhere to work, especially at Warwick Gates.
Remaining agricultural land needed to feed future generations.
Why decision not to build new settlement below A46/J15 interchange where direct road links available.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4170

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: A J Bryan

Representation Summary:

Infrastructure. Traffic already queuing trying to exit Birches Lane to St John's Island - can only get worse.
A452 to Leamington one of the busiest single carriageway roads in Warwickshire - plans abandoned to 'dual' it.
Railway cuts through Kenilworth - access to town centre or from town centre to Warwick and Birmingham must find way over line. Results in lots of traffic using bridges.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4200

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

Representation Summary:

There has been insufficient consideration of infrastructure requirements and the existing infrastructure could be used more effectively if new development was spread more evenly throughout the district. The plans need to be re-considered.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4221

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Rev. J.G. Lister

Representation Summary:

No provision for new roads and infrastructure - how would people feed onto road system. Warwick bridge cannot take more and Myton Road is solid.
Where would children go to school? Where is extra health provision? Where will people find work? or will people commute, making area dormitory town without sense of community or soul?

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4268

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Kulwinder Fathers

Representation Summary:

Infrastructure i.e. water, roads and schools etc. are already overstretched in Whitnash, South Leamington, South Warwick, Heathcote & Bishops Tachbrook. This has not been considered in the proposed development within the core strategy.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4282

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lorraine J Gowing

Representation Summary:

Object to Kings Hill site:
Local roads inadequate to accommodate massive increase in traffic leading to congestion and pollution.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4286

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr M G Miles

Representation Summary:

Object to Kings Hill site:
A severe lack of infrastructure to support network of housing.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4289

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: H R Anderson

Representation Summary:

Object to Thickthorn site:
Town lacks resources to cater for so many new residents. Extra traffic

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4292

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Miles

Representation Summary:

Object to Kings Hill site:
Lack of transport and infrastructure
Lack of support - doctors, dentists, schools
Drainage issues and supply of water

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4298

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Heather Cooper

Representation Summary:

Object to Kings Hill site:
Road system could not cope with extra traffic. A45 would be gridlocked at peak times.
Amenities, facilities and services

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4304

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Wade

Representation Summary:

Object to Kings Hill site:
Unemployment set to rise, where are the jobs?
Road congestion will increase.
.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4309

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Anne S Statham

Representation Summary:

Object to Kings Hill site:
Lack of infrastructure, roads, drains, sewers, schools, health centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4317

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Trevor E Wood

Representation Summary:

No impact plan commissioned.
No consideration given to:
Schools, children from same families go to different schools typically opposing travel/traffic strategy
Police - crime increased since Warwick Gates developed
Dentists
Doctors
Road access - congestion. Bridge to Warwick and Leamington bottlenecks, M40 backs up to Longbridge Island in morning.
Services/utilities - already stretched to limit
Leisure facilities - built to placate residents when Warwick Gates built but are poorly utilised, inaccessible, incomplete
Flora and fauna - currently woodpeckers, muntjacks, foxes and many wild birds which would be compromised if Woodsite Farm site was developed.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4326

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

Representation Summary:

Expressed views about increased traffic when Warwick Gates built - nothing done. Results in stationary traffic on M40 queuing to access Leamington and Warwick at peak periods.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4330

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Janette Eslick

Representation Summary:

Concerned area around Europa Way impact on traffic, increase in flood risk on land currently acts as soakaway and is rich habitat for wildlife.
Traffic - south of Warwick already at saturation with Myton Road virtually impassable at peak times. No capacity for more cars. Detrimental to residents and tourism.
Increased risk of flooding - at present run off is slowed by pasture and crops. Development results in flooding of houses.
Loss of habitat - impact on woodpeckers, buzzards, bats, foxes, deer, newts and hedgehogs.
Impact on infrastructure - strain on local services; GP surgeries, hospital, drainage, sewerage and public transport.
Local school capacity - schools oversubscribed. Problems arose when Warwick Gates developed without new school..

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4336

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Janet Davis

Representation Summary:

Object to 800 houses on Thickthorn. Infrastructure required. Additional traffic will alter whole concept of area.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4341

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Clive Letchford

Representation Summary:

Location on edge of town and problems of transport - lack of effective public transport and increasing car congestion
Burden on services, police, health and education
Lack of indication of where people will be employed - already significant numbers of commuters

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4350

Received: 25/08/2009

Respondent: Dominic Simpson

Representation Summary:

Worried that increase in housing is not balanced by infrastructure required to cope with increased traffic, utilities, schools and services. Needs to be in place before development built as problems in past with water supply and school place provision.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4367

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Kirby

Representation Summary:

No mention of enhancing infrastructure - police, health, schools, sewerage etc.
Village already escape route for traffic from principal feeder roads.
Village on verge of urban encapsulation by triangle of roads to Warwick, Leamington, and M40.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4377

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: A Picken

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4384

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Daniel & Elizabeth Sheethan

Representation Summary:

If developments were to go ahead, new pinch points created by bridges crossing canals and rivers.
Council has highlighted unacceptable traffic congestion but now seems to be commending 'good communications network'
New building would lack school, medical, leisure and sports facilities.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4393

Received: 26/08/2009

Respondent: R.F. Garner

Representation Summary:

Traffic will increase causing problems on already overcrowded routes. Quality of life in rural areas will deteriorate with no compensating benefits for local people.
Infrastructure - Already stretched due in part to lack of facilities at Warwick Gates. No assurances about new resources: police, medical, schools, shops, leisure facilities, parks, will be provided - likley to be woefully inadequate.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4406

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.L.K. Drew

Representation Summary:

Roads already congested and often approach gridlock if there is an accident. Concerns about effect on some historic buildings from vibrations caused by heavy traffic. Most new households would have at least one car - how will traffic keep moving? What plans for dealing with increased pollution and deterioration in air quality in towns and increased deterioration in road surfaces.
Bishops Tachbrook is already used as rat run by commuters avoiding Europa Way - particularly dangerous to school children. What measures proposed to prevent this and reduce risk to villagers.
Rivers form physical obstacles to traffic movement. Increase in population south of river, remote from emergency services, seems unwise.