Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Infrastructure?

Object

Representation ID: 103

Received: 03/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Zita Lowe

Warwick Gates is a prime example of Builders hoodwinking people to be able to get the planning a school was to have been built on the site this did not happen we are suffering the effect of overcrowded schools or children not getting places in local schools, this has a knockon effect as the children do not have a smooth transition into school and the Nursery schools lose out as their younger siblings are unable to attend the nursery logistics of collecting children from their committed schools are away from their catchment. Affordable homes-familys-enhancing problem

Support

Representation ID: 135

Received: 06/07/2009

Respondent: R A Chapleo

Agreed

Object

Representation ID: 276

Received: 10/07/2009

Respondent: Patricia Robinson

Sounds politically correct meaningless jargon/target setting. Sugges review numbers required of new houses - don't think local, regional or national government are correct.

Object

Representation ID: 370

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

No.

Support

Representation ID: 446

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 498

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 569

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 632

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 721

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

No.

Support

Representation ID: 792

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 860

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

The Council admitted at a recent public meeting that the infrastructure impact of the plans has not yet been properly investigated

Object

Representation ID: 924

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

Lack of current schooling particularly Warwick Gates area - not convinced the Council has looked into this enough - it's a major problem now let alone with new homes.

Object

Representation ID: 1005

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Cllr Tim Sawdon

Section 11 is waffle!

Object

Representation ID: 1029

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Do't believe there is sufficient infrastructure to support growth. Roads are already busy.

Support

Representation ID: 1092

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1132

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Developer money should be used on infrastructure directly related to the development concerned. This should be traceable and accountable. All too often the money goes into a black hole, and spend on infrastructure is neglected.

Comment

Representation ID: 1192

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Yes

Object

Representation ID: 1250

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

Impact studies on traffic and schools should have been completed BEFORE this document was published. Have WCC been consulted with regard to access implications at Woodside Farm/ implications on increase of pupils at KS1/KS2 and KS3?

Object

Representation ID: 1317

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

No
WCC have not been consulted about the impact of traffie and/or additional children in our local schools. This core strategy is flawed since consultation is incomplete.

Object

Representation ID: 1440

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Larraine Curzon

How can a 'plan' make no reference of already heavily congested roads andlack of infrastructure

Object

Representation ID: 1487

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Kundi

Number of people: 2

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 1565

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: B.L.A.S.T.

11a Warwick Gates is living proof that developers can't be trusted to deliver the promised infrastructure - the estate has been built, the houses sold but still no school - a levy would have given the residents a school then whereas now it is still just promises and no action

Object

Representation ID: 1614

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Mr G A Cox

In relation to the proposed housing south of Leamington, Warwick and Whitnash - no provision has been made for the increased volume of traffic entering Leamington and Warwick through already congested river bridges or the impact of traffic on surrounding areas such as Bishop's Tachbrook.

Object

Representation ID: 1649

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

No. Check on the views expressed at the recent Public Meeting at Guy's Hall, Warwick School.

Object

Representation ID: 1701

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1745

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Object

Object

Representation ID: 1788

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1844

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1883

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Already shortage of schools, also inadequate public transport, health too

Object

Representation ID: 1918

Received: 14/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Cederic Box

Object to 4200 proposed housing located close to Bishops Tachbrook. Recent poll identified that the village need only 15 extra homes. Dont want to become another suburb of Leamington Spa. The lack of infrastructure would have a similar detrimental impact on the village's amenities as happened when Warwick Gates was built, such as low water pressure, raw sewage overflow, lack of places at the local school as villlage places are taken by new development, medical services stretched beyond capacity, more traffic congestion and parking problems.