Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Infrastructure?

Support

Representation ID: 2640

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2756

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Facilities are adequate but new housing will require more schools, especially primaryschools, more sports facilities and health services for the young and also the ageing population to be adequately cared for.

Object

Representation ID: 2800

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Your proposals do not identify what new roads, schools, shops, medical facilities etc are proposed if extra building is done. The present system is already choked with traffic!

Object

Representation ID: 2844

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2883

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2912

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: ALISON ELFWOOD

NO ONE AT WDC WILL GIVE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT ROADS, SCHOOLS, DOCTORS, SHOPS. WHY WON'T YOU RELEASE THIS INFO? hAVE YOU THOUGHT ABOUT IT? DO YOU HAVE SOLUTIONS OR JUST PIE IN THE SKY..IT'S NOT HAPPENING IN MY BACK YARD, WHY SHOULD I CARE!

Object

Representation ID: 2943

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Not enough detail provided of "WDC thoughts so far" - that comes later!
This council believes that it is inappropriate to choose locations for development without knowledge of what infrastructure changes would be considered essential/appropriate to support such proposals, AND of proposals in neighbouring district council areas that may produce pressures on WDC area infrastructure.

Object

Representation ID: 2994

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Cannot/ will not maintain existing highways let alone develop a new ones - someone needs to view existing traffic problems in Green Lane plus its tributaries - absolute chaos at (schools ) (2) start and finish

Support

Representation ID: 3052

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Katharine Whigham

seems a more strategic and bigger picture view

Object

Representation ID: 3098

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

The present road system is already overloaded from the south without further development

Object

Representation ID: 3126

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mel Gillman

The infrastructure has not been identified. Main roads within the areas of development are already over capacity particularly around warwick gates and whitnash.

Object

Representation ID: 3176

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.C Hadfield

No mention of extra roads, schools or increased medical provision in the Options paper.

Object

Representation ID: 3177

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

Not enough detail provided of "WDC thoughts so far" - that comes later! All too vague!
We believe that it is inappropriate to choose locations for development without knowledge of what infrastructure changes are essential/appropriate to support such proposals, AND of proposals in neighbouring district council areas that may produce pressures on WDC area infrastructure.

Support

Representation ID: 3282

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

I support it.

Object

Representation ID: 3316

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Caroline Martin

More thought is required about education and medical services if Thickthorn is developed to the extent proposed.

Support

Representation ID: 3331

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3373

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Christopher Gibb

It's all based around the M40 access - yet in peak hours this is already full with long traffic jams. Access to Leamington Station is mentioned, but thats not enough - car park is full by 0800 and all the commuter trains to Birmingham are all full now.

Object

Representation ID: 3442

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Gillian F Starkey

Looking at infrastrucure later is back to front approach. Unless provision of schools, medical services, traffic management etc addressed and necessary improvements included, will continue to actively object.

Comment

Representation ID: 3458

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Robert Starkey

Massive investment in infrastructure required and not convinced it will be forthcoming once a point of no return is reached.

Object

Representation ID: 3483

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs E. Appleby

Object

Object

Representation ID: 3525

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Horsley

Infrastructure already strained. Roads are choked at particular times of the day. Schools area at bursting point. Doctors and dentists surgeries oversubscribed.

Object

Representation ID: 3538

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: R.F. Garner

Infrastructure already overstretched partly due to failure to provide adequate facilities at Warwick Gates. No assurances for future provision of police, medical facilities, schools, shops, leisure facilities, parks. Likely to be woefully inadequate based on past performance

Object

Representation ID: 3539

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: R.F. Garner

Not enough work for inhabitants of 4200 new houses in Leamington and Warwick; will therefore commute. Roads already inadequate. Increasing number of cars will be detrimental to local area and Leamington/Warwick where cars will need to use routes across town.

Object

Representation ID: 3543

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Chris and Pauline Vaughan

No survey of traffic especially at rush hour, term time and rat run likely at Bishops Tachbrook. Four motorway junctions in space of five miles on M40, already creating through traffic in BT. More homes will make it more difficult to exit Technology Park on Gallows Hill and increase congestion at Europa Way roundabout. Traffic already increased due to more shops at Shires Retail Park and will increase when temple complete. Increased wear and tear on bridges. Infrastructure not been planned for new roads, bridges, schools, doctors, dentists, acceptable water pressure/supply, sewerage and drainage to ensure areas will never flood.

Object

Representation ID: 3547

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Chris and Pauline Vaughan

Object for the following reasons:
Increased traffic, lack of infrastructure, access to Warwick hospital, increased pollution leading to loss of quality of life, enough new housing built over last 15 years - who will live there?

Object

Representation ID: 3555

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Jean Drew

Infrastructure:already inadequate
Water supply: poor pressure in Bishops Tachbrook after Warwick Gates built so Severn Trent had to build new pumping station.
Sewers: inadequate for village. Sewage flows into fardens onto Oakley Wood Road when torrential rain falls occur
Surface Drainage: flooding occurs on Oakley Wood Road where is crosses Tach Brook - more houses will increase problem along Tach Brook valley
Roads:
Congestion at peak times will worsen as will pollution. Traffic will increase through Bishops Tachbrook adding to speeding problems
Education: Not enough primary school places now. If more children have to travel to school, traffic will increase. Children at school outside area decreases social development of community.
Services: Police and doctors stretched now and will come under more pressure. Emergency vehicles will have to contend with congested bridges across rivers in Leamington and Warwick
Employment: Will be few jobs for new residents. Why build on green belt land for people to travel elsewhere to work?

Object

Representation ID: 3573

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

object

Object

Representation ID: 3577

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Jean Shaddick

Infrastructure is not in place to deal with development. Traffic problems, especially with getting to Warwick hospital and ambulances will take longer through extra traffic. Told not to increase flood risk by not concreting over gardens.

Object

Representation ID: 3606

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Sport England

As the District council does not have a fully compliant PPG 17 strategy in place, they are unable to identify all reasonable options for infrastructure.

Object

Representation ID: 3610

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Robin and Anne Tole

Access: Green Lane and Gretna Road narrow and busy with parked vehicles parked making negotiation difficult. Kings Hill Lane narrow country lane too difficult for large vehicles to negotiate. A46 and surrounding roads around Stoneleigh and traffic for University and Westwood Business Park already problem and additional traffic would cause bottlenecks on A45.
Social Factors: Schools are oversubscribed. Further building needed or more car journeys needed to take them to other Warwickshire schools. No facilities for children such as playgrounds. Bus service very limited. No local community facility, local shops inadequate. Would require even more building to provide these.