Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Infrastructure?

Object

Representation ID: 3619

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs D H Cowgill

Schools full, doctors, dentists, police services stretched. Commercial sites remain empty so where will people find employment. Already two major developments on last few years at South farm and Warwick Gates overloading services in Whitnash.

Object

Representation ID: 3623

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr C K Mason

Different components of funtional infrastructure have individual and collective capacities which will be pressurised to the point of failure if 2500 houses built with increased localised population density. Key service provision (water, sewage management, health and education) would need to be in place before completion of estates.
Traffic congestion issues and pressure points well known. Increased flow will increase prospect of everything being brought to a standstill on a more regular basis with significant economic cost.

Object

Representation ID: 3626

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Donald Gregson

No consideration to basic infrastructure - roads and transport, primary and secondary schools, healthcare, community facilities, water, drainage, sewage etc.
Impact studies (traffic and environmental) and employment provision studies needed.

Object

Representation ID: 3630

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Dominic Simpson

Increase in housing not balanced by infrastructure necessary to cope - traffic, utilities, schools and services. Recent problems at Warwick Gates/Bishops Tachbrook over water supply and lack of promised school at Warwick Gates

Object

Representation ID: 3676

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Keay

Little detail on traffic congestion, flood risk, school provision.

Object

Representation ID: 3713

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

The IDP was needed with the Preferred Option - we need bridges, roads, hospitals, schools, libraries, community centres on a grand scale and recent past experience at Warwick Gates is that developers will provide less than required. A proper, integrated Masterplan is really needed for acceptance of the Core Stategy by us.

Object

Representation ID: 3734

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Ailsa Chambers

Unsustainable pressure on road infrastructure.

Object

Representation ID: 3738

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: D S Edwicker

Un-necessary pressure on infrastructure - hospitals, schools. Increased crime.
Need for major road construction, schools, medical facilities, recreational areas and additional policiing. Unlikely sewerage and flood control would integrate with existing systems without major costs

Object

Representation ID: 3739

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs L J Stevens

Infrastructure needed. Poor air quality produced by additional traffic. Where will people work? Vacant factories and offices in Warwick and Leamington - residents of Warwick Gates commute out of area. Hospital cannot expand.

Object

Representation ID: 3746

Received: 13/08/2009

Respondent: Alan N Gandy

Warwick Gates demonstrates effect on services of large development.

Support

Representation ID: 3750

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3776

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Roger P Withers

Infrastructure would not support development. Existing schools unable to cope. Roads already too busy especially at school and University opening and closing times.

Object

Representation ID: 3779

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kate McCutchion

Lack of infrastructure, pressure on roads

Object

Representation ID: 3782

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Carol Pritchard

Poor access to amenities, poor public transport so use of car a necessity.
Has feasibility been discussed with Severn Trent? Already problems with sewage in Finham area so would need major investment to cope with such a large development.

Object

Representation ID: 3792

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Morrall

Local amenities such as schools, GP surgery, dental provision and public transport need upgrading

Object

Representation ID: 3797

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Veda Morrall

Local amenities such as schools, shops, GP surgery, dental practice and public transport will need upgrading. School provision may not be upgraded in timely and appropriate manner.

Object

Representation ID: 3806

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pat Weake

No infrastructure in place. Schools and health facilities, hospital car parking inadquate now, ambulances will be held up in traffic.

Object

Representation ID: 3809

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: J P G Hattersley

No account taken of supporting infrastructure and provision of more offices, factories for employment. Further land and outlay will be required for schools, sports fields and other leisure facilities, shops, churches, car parking including park and ride site, not to mention utilities, sewage and flood prevention. What consulation has taken place with Severn Trent on feasibility?

Object

Representation ID: 3823

Received: 04/08/2009

Respondent: Patricia and William Smith

Serious concern over Kings Hill site:
Local schools oversubscribed.
No facilities for children such as playgrounds
Bus service limited
No local community centre or entertainment
shops inadequate
Massive amount of buildings needed in addition to houses resulting in more loss of green belt

Object

Representation ID: 3829

Received: 17/08/2009

Respondent: Philip and Barbara Lennon

Full infrastructure survey needed.
Emergency services need to assess time it would take to attend emergency if houses were built.
Severn Trent Water must be consulted regarding costing and ability to supply water and sewerage service to each option.

Object

Representation ID: 3848

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Paul and Caroline Whitwood

Object to unfair burden on small areas affected by proposals. Should be shared across district's towns and villages reducing impact on infrastructure. Why no detailed traffic impact study or detailed infrastructure feasibility carried out? Traffic at Warwick Gates/Whitnash; problems already exist and will deteriorate further.Major amenities are on opposite side of river causing congestion on bridges and approaches. Increase in traffic using M40 junctions. Location of proposed development near to Bishops Tachbrook.
SHLAA sites plan shows worst case scenarios in order to gain favour for preferred option, contradicting vision.
Area of restraint to protect Bishops Tachbrook and Tachbrook Mallory, inadequate. Villages would be dominated by elevated housing devt. Will make development of remaining land more likely. Why can't existing boundary at Harbury Lane be retained?

Object

Representation ID: 3860

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Jane Kearey

Object to Plan 5 and Europa Way in particular:
Infrastructure not in place.

Object

Representation ID: 3884

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Patricia Diane Freeman

Where would the employment go/come from? This is most important in today's age. No library facilities for people who live here.

Object

Representation ID: 3889

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: L M D Louise, Matthew, David Drinkhall Paul Kalus Anthony Barrett

No infrastructure plans for drainage, sewerage, roads, public transport, telecommunications, schools and hospitals. Roads gridlocked, especially at school times. Parking difficult near schools and parked cars make roads narrow. Excessive pollution.
No impact studies carried out on traffic, schools, drainage, sewerage, hospitals and employment. Schools are oversubscribed. Hospital has no capacity for expansion.
Flooding will occure when current drainage system unable to cope with increased housing and runoff no longer slowed by pasture and crops.
Why was this area not put into phase 3 to give time to address this?

Object

Representation ID: 3897

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S S Khera

Object to Kings Hill Site.
Lack of Infrastructure
Roads cannot support
Homes should be built when there is a demand and employment nearby. In current economic downturn there are not enough jobs for existing households, nevermind new ones.

Object

Representation ID: 3909

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

So because you only consider what the developers will pay for in terms of infrastructure you call this a strategy. This is more a case of lack of vision, ineffective staff, poor direction from the Chief Executive or worse. No you most definitely have not considered all the options for infrastructure, nor have you clearly identified what you call an infrastructure or why you feel infrastructure comes last when your govt advisers such as CABE and PAS state it should come first. Definitely a "putting the cart before the horse methodology!"

Comment

Representation ID: 3964

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr John Archer

I think it is aimpossible to have a clear view of all infrastructure options at this stage, Further sub regional work is needed to identify such needs and feed in at a later stage of plan production

Object

Representation ID: 3990

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr M Abba

sadly lacking in any detail

Object

Representation ID: 4064

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Keith Turfrey

The options identified and discussed look reasonable and address most concerns. It is a pity therefore that the core strategy so far proposed does not reflect these ideals and instead is likely to make the infrastructure more fragile.

Comment

Representation ID: 4075

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

I do not think there is enough detail about proposed infrastructure provided within the core strategy document. I do not see evidence of links with other districts or the county council - althought this may be taking place.