(vi) Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury Lane

Object

Representation ID: 2303

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: M Wiles

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2305

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: M Wiles

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2324

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2378

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Anonymous 13

Object to the proposed building houses around our Park Home in Harbury Lane. We would be dead centre of housing estates.

Traffic congestion would be massive

Object

Representation ID: 2400

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

No.

Support

Representation ID: 2439

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2469

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Peter Phizackerley

As a resident of a Heathcote Park this would utterly destroy the attractive rural landscape which we enjoy.

Such a massive intrusion would clearly overload the existing support services and lead to increased pollution and put a severe strain on existing water supplies.

Object

Representation ID: 2478

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr D J Bradshaw

Leamington and Warwick are in danger of becoming like a city and any new road network put in to serve the new development will be of no help to the congestion in Leamington and Warwick.
The area of Warwick Gates/Whitnash has had enough development.

Comment

Representation ID: 2533

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Margrave

As other adjacent area.
1. Would cause over-development of Whitnash, extending urban sprawl beyong reasonable means.
2. Water and road infrastructure cannot take the expansion. No investigation has been conducted.
3. Would cause further erosion of borders between Whitnash and Bishop's tachbrook creating an ugly contiguous urban sprawl from B.T. to North Leamington.
4. Insufficient availability of school places.
5. Loss of valuable agricultural land.
6. Development here would cause further traffic problems with people having to drive into Leamington/Kenilworth/Coventry to work.

Support

Representation ID: 2626

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2686

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2718

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Opposed to creeping urbanisation

Support

Representation ID: 2748

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Good land for extending current housing.

Object

Representation ID: 2838

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2877

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2935

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

This should be most strenuously resisted.
* Loss of valuable agricultural land
* Excessive creeping towards Bishops Tachbrook , eroding the buffer zone/area of restraint
* Too demanding of new infrastructure implementation
* All existing infrastructure is north of river with limited crossing possibilities
* Significant impact on communications into/through Warwick/Leamington

Object

Representation ID: 2986

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Object

Support

Representation ID: 3045

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Katharine Whigham

Provided infrastructure can support this

Object

Representation ID: 3067

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard James

To concentrate some much development in one area of south Leamington in addition to the development carried out over the last 10 years is not sustainable. I do not believe the huge investment which will be necessary will be forthcoming to dramically improve the current infrastucture.

Object

Representation ID: 3089

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Too great a number of houses for the need's of Bishops Tahbrook's parish.

Object

Representation ID: 3123

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mel Gillman

Strongly object due to:
- Inability of current roads and schools to cope with current levels of housing. 4000 extra homes are not viable on the earmarked site.
- Loss of green belt.
- Available sites close by that are currently scheduled for employment land and have not been used for over 10 years.
- Loss of rural village as this will merge with the larger urban area.

Object

Representation ID: 3166

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

This should be most strenuously resisted.
* Loss of valuable agricultural land
* Excessive creeping towards Bishops Tachbrook , eroding the buffer zone/area of restraint
* Too demanding of new infrastructure implementation
* All existing infrastructure is north of river with limited crossing possibilities
* Significant impact on communications into/through Warwick/Leamington

Object

Representation ID: 3274

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

This is an area of green belt land and farming
land which should be left as it is. In this district we have Warwick Gates which is a mini town in it self.

Object

Representation ID: 3366

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David Neale

Green fields south of Leamington should not be built on as area of restraint which seems to move when council want to develop land. Not option preferred by the public.

Object

Representation ID: 3367

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Christopher Gibb

Development here will encourage more car journeys via the M40, aminly because Leamington station car park is full at 0800, and all the commuter trains to Birmingham are full too. Schools and roads are all full.

Object

Representation ID: 3372

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David Neale

Green fields south of Leamington should not be built on as area of restraint which seems to move when council want to develop land. Not option preferred by the public.

Object

Representation ID: 3376

Received: 14/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Hazel Neale

Developing south of Leamington will make a sprawling suburb. Heathcote and Bishops Tachbrook will be like living in city without city ammenities. Lack of community. People will still use cars and this will make Leamington and Warwick unpopular. People will go elsewhere. Warwick Castle will lose visitors.

Object

Representation ID: 3399

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

Too many!

Object

Representation ID: 3420

Received: 29/08/2009

Respondent: Miss Stephanie Hawkins

Would destroy Bishops Tachbrook and make it suburb of Leamington. BT has need for only 15 houses. Infrastructure of area already under strain and this would increase traffic through village and on bridges into towns. Against vision.

Object

Representation ID: 3426

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs J Morby

Object to development south of Warwick due to traffic congestion and potential increase through village of commuters heading for M40 and A46 junctions.