(vi) Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury Lane

Support

Representation ID: 1758

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Lord sunder sandher

Good for local business.

Object

Representation ID: 1759

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Harbury Lane is a danger zone. It can take several minutes to exit Heathcote Park. Traffic and pollution will worsen.

Existing schools and healtcare and sewers will be unable to cope.

Support

Representation ID: 1826

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1867

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Same reasons as on previous pages still brings too much traffic into Warwick.
Harbury Lane is already crowded in rush hour and inhabitants of new houses built south of Warwick and Leamington would need access the towns for shopping or employment over the bridges in place at present, thus slowing dwon commuting times still further.

Comment

Representation ID: 1869

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Concerns about traffic generation and lack of infrastructure

Object

Representation ID: 1907

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Miss K A Hattersley

Strongly objects to proposals to build 4,200 homes on sites west of Europa Way, Lower Heathcote Farm to the south of harbury lane, Woodside Farm to the north of Harbury Lane and east of Whitnash.
The requirement does not take into account the need for supporting infrastructure such as schools, leisure facilities etc and the provision of offices and factories for employment. What consultation has been undertaken with Severn Trent on the feasibility of providing the necessary facilities and infrastructure?
No travel survey has been undertaken. The new housing could easily involve 8,000 more vehicles to the further detriment of air quality in the towns.
It will have a serious impact on access to the M40 junctions and traffic travelling in and out of Warwick and Leamington. Congestion at the start and end of the day will become worse and with the limited bridges over the rivers this will impact on bus and train services as well as the time it takes to get to Warwick Hospital. The towns will be subjected to a greater risk of traffic damage and air pollution.

Object

Representation ID: 1941

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

We have Warwick Gates already.

Object

Representation ID: 1993

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: K A Ferguson

On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodatehousing needs over the next 18 years.

Object

Representation ID: 2007

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: A. J Daubnley

On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses

proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodat housing needs over the next 18 years.

Object

Representation ID: 2018

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses

proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of

life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodat housing needs over the next 18

years.

Object

Representation ID: 2028

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: G Pritchard

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2108

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: J Wenzel

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2116

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: B & N Blackham and Ellis

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in

the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2124

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in

the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2137

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: S P Jones

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2152

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: D E Alderson

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in

the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2160

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2173

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2185

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Further expansion onto greenfield sites is objected to.

Object

Representation ID: 2206

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Keefe family

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2221

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: G Lane

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2231

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: A B Partridge

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2232

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: A B Partridge

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2241

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Gerrardo Luccio Luccio

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2242

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Gerrardo Luccio Luccio

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2253

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2262

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: M Weeks

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2263

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: M Weeks

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2273

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Michelle Pye

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 2287

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: S Shanahan

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.