Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Rural Communities?

Support

Representation ID: 5575

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5616

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Val Pestell

The effect of all these new homes in one place will also have a large inpact on village life and will not enhance the community. Again in your own statement regarding to these plans you state you are trying to enhance the quality of village life.

Support

Representation ID: 5650

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Provided that infrastructure is enhanced to support expanded rural communities

Support

Representation ID: 5696

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5759

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Allotment land provides a sustainable cohesion in rural areas and binds the fabric of the local communities to work together for the common good (as has been the case since feudal times). It is important to maintain the need to keep allotment land available around villages and not let them become expensive housing estates. While at the same time maintaining the rural space between rural and urban communities

Support

Representation ID: 5843

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5886

Received: 05/10/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs C G Price

Object

Object

Representation ID: 5911

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Its a fallacy that to build more will keep facilities, since the last ware more development occured but commercial has declined.

Object

Representation ID: 5991

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Harris

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 6026

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 6067

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Skidmore

I'm sure there are pockets of land around rural areas to be used which will offload some of the houses.

Object

Representation ID: 6133

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow

Number of people: 2

One cannot know whether the Council has identified all reasonable options or indeed whether any of those are identified are reasonable options.

Object

Representation ID: 6155

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Barry & Valerie Sankey

Number of people: 2

Development at Kings Hill will be the loss of a rare inroad of rural life and will be an indication to villages that they will soon be swallowed up.

Object

Representation ID: 6183

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Object

Support

Representation ID: 6252

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

support

Object

Representation ID: 6312

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Cheatle

Rural communities may not retain their identity if they join up main towns.

Object

Representation ID: 6335

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 6437

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

Support

Support

Representation ID: 6689

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

support

Support

Representation ID: 6864

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Binswood Allotment Society

support

Comment

Representation ID: 6934

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

Rural Communities
The Preferred Options Paper should be more prescriptive in it‟s dealing with employment and in particular with the diversification of activities undertaken within the farming communities. We wonder how rural buildings can be re-used for economic purposes such as tourism. Since most buildings are asbestos cement roofed barns do we put ramblers and hikers up overnight? But there could be opportunities for one or two nationally marketed leisure breaks in former mansions enlarged to provide attractive leisure facilities, with an imaginative approach to conservation as being the next stage in the life of that building complex similar to Walton Hall and others. It is however too small an initiative to rate being included in the core strategy.

Support

Representation ID: 6993

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Supported, but see comments on affordable housing

Comment

Representation ID: 7055

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Warwick and Leamington Green Party

Greater support needed for agricultural industries. Developments must be allowed to stimulate local food economy.
Farmland not merely aesthetic consideration. Farmland is scarce, valuable resource that must be protected for food production. Only allow housing on agricultural land for people who work on land. Restrict change of use of buildings from Agricultural / industrial into residential, and conversion of multiple dwellings into single.
Our rural communities often lack affordable housing, but impossible to impose affordable housing requirement on single developments. Advocates affordable housing levy, based on 10% of development completion value.

Object

Representation ID: 7094

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: CPRE Warwickshire

Object to allowing market housing in villages and hamlets, but support policy to provide affordable housing restricted in perpetuity to residents who have grown up in the area. This needs to be rented as market housing in the District's villages will never be 'affordable' in terms of within the price range for lower-income households.

Support policy which positively encourages provision of jobs in rural communities.
Quite possible that as price of fuel rises, it will become less desirable to live in the countryside, and that the value of rural property will decline and therefore become more affordable for local people.

Object

Representation ID: 7468

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Hatton Estate

Agent: RPS Planning

In paragraph 9.8 it states that it is not possible within the Core Strategy to identify, or plan for, what the local need should be in terms of new development within each of the villages.

Whilst we acknowledge that the District Council needs to work closely with Parish Councils, this should not be at the expense of the requirements set out in PPS7.

As each village has different characteristics, the CS should identify which villages can in principle meet certain important criteria, which needs to be specified in order to provide clear guidance to parish councils.

Object

Representation ID: 7551

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Mr George Jones

Object

Support

Representation ID: 7660

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Forrester of Loes Farm, Guys Cliffe

Agent: Barlow Associates Limited

Support, but should be more wide ranging. Employment is often needed in villages, positive policies for the re-use of rural buildings are paramount.

Object

Representation ID: 7686

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ray Bullen

Should be more prescriptive with farm diversification. How can rural buildings be re-used for economic purposes, since most are asbestos cement roofed barns.
Could be opportunities for leisure breaks in former mansions similar to Walton Hall. Points out changes occurring in rural communities with rise of cars and dormitory settlements eroding sense of rural community. Have to build on changes. Each community will have different issues but some commonalities. PCs should be encouraged to lead rural community finding ways of providing new facilities at small scale. Inhabitants of dormitory villages are comparatively well off and could be persuaded to support initiatives.

Support

Representation ID: 33612

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33613

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Support