Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Rural Communities?

Showing comments and forms 61 to 90 of 126

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3604

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Sport England

Representation Summary:

The re-use of buildings and land should also be considored for uses in connection with traditional and exterme sports

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3644

Received: 15/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3664

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Keay

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3698

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Representation Summary:

Yes

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3863

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

Representation Summary:

No the council has not considered the correlation between developing urban and villages together. There has to be a strategy that ensures the approach supports urban and villages. The council needs to talk to CABE and check out their advice on sustainable cities as well as looking at the historical development of it's villages. Too many restrictions seem to be the problem across the board. You don't seem to have consulted your various parish councils with your strategy - why not?

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3868

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Patricia Diane Freeman

Representation Summary:

have you considered all implications involved: - Traffic, schools, few shops in Green Lane, doctors surgery, dentists, post office, libraries etc.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3932

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

Representation Summary:

support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3970

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Kim Matthews

Representation Summary:

Insufficient thought has been given to development of rural areas to make villages more sustainable communities. For example development between Kenilworth and Leek Wootton would have a number of advantages: providing a larger customer base to make provision of facilities/retail in Leek Wootton; the area has ready access to the A46 and Kenilworth town centre; the development could incorporate a cycle path from from Leek Woootton to Kenilworth encouraging sustainable transport.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4037

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4040

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

Representation Summary:

there is a need to include leisure and play facilities available within villages.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4174

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire Rural Community Council

Representation Summary:

WRCC supports the proposed measures to maintain the sustainability of the rural areas, provided this is framed in an exception policy to retain control over unsuitable developments

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4196

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

Representation Summary:

More employment land should be allocated to rural areas, other than Bishops tachcbrook, Heathcote and Whitnash. Additional affordable housing should encourage a change in the demographics and help to ensure that rural communities, schools & services are sustained

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4246

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Kulwinder Fathers

Representation Summary:

More employment land should be allocated to rural areas, other than the over developed areas of Bishops Tachcbrook, Heathcote and Whitnash. More affordable housing will encourage changes in the demographics and help rural communities, schools & services to be sustained.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4364

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: A Picken

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4527

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4528

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4591

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4665

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

Representation Summary:

Continue to work with Rural parishes.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4863

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

Representation Summary:


Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4931

Received: 08/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

Representation Summary:

Qualified YES - The rural parts of the District receive scant consideration. It is a pity that the opportunity has not been taken to develop and enhance the symbiotic relationship relationship between the rural and urban areas to give the Strategy greater synergy.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4932

Received: 08/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

Representation Summary:

Qualified support - The preferred option perhaps expresses the ideal objective , but does it give sufficient recognition to the practicalities of delivery bearing in mind the economics of smaller numbers of smaller-sized houses?

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5042

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5125

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

Representation Summary:

Some rural communities do need better communications, so a spreading of development, rather than a concentration (bottleneck) would make more sense.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5172

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

Representation Summary:

As I've said before - keep greenbelt green

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5199

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5282

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

Representation Summary:

The Council has recognised that some of the District's smaller villages and hamlets have already lost many of their services and therefore no longer offer the necessary range of community facilities, local access to jobs or key services. The option of not allowing any further housing in those settlements would only exacerbate the problems, resulting in the ultimate extinction of these communities, not
least by denying such villages and hamlets the opportunity for regeneration through proposals for development of new facilities, linked with additional housing.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5336

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

Representation Summary:

The core strategy should be more prescriptive in it's dealing with employment and in particular with the diversification of activities undertaken within the farming communities.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5387

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5436

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

Representation Summary:

The Core Strategy recognizes the need to provide for "office/Hi-Tech R&D/Light Manufacturing adjacent to housing. The Strategy could promote/support such activity in rural communities.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5519

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Support.