Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Rural Communities?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 30 of 126

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 101

Received: 03/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Zita Lowe

Representation Summary:

I think the Council has identified the pitfalls involved in this plan

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 121

Received: 06/07/2009

Respondent: R A Chapleo

Representation Summary:

No - I think this is apolitical resonse. Rural communities IN THIS DISTRICT require no strengthening.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 148

Received: 06/07/2009

Respondent: R Clipson

Representation Summary:

You should not be supporting 'market housing' in most villages. This leads to higher income families mostly commuting into towns to work or even taking the car to the station and commuting to London or Birmingham. They shop at an out of town shopping centre and do not support village life.
They also force up the price of local housing and the young people cannot afford to stay in the village.
We must support affordable housing to get life back into the villages and support local shops, pubs and other services.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 209

Received: 03/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Baxter

Representation Summary:

No.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 258

Received: 10/07/2009

Respondent: Patricia Robinson

Representation Summary:

Injecting new housing into rural areas but result in viable school numbers, demand for local shops.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 326

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D Bolam

Representation Summary:

Rural communities difficulties identified.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 353

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

Representation Summary:

No.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 431

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 482

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Representation Summary:

Some system of actively helping village communities to maintain or re-open shops / post offices etc would be helpful.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 552

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 615

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 705

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 743

Received: 06/08/2009

Respondent: West Midlands RSL Planning Consortium

Agent: Tetlow King Planning

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 9.8 is not supported as these go against PPS3 advice in paragraph 30.
The Council should, therefore, go further than encouraging Parish Councils to carry out research, and seek to include within the Core Strategy and evidence base information regarding local needs. In doing so, evidence would point to those areas of greatest need and allow the Council to set out a robust policy on rural exceptions sites to allow for 100% affordable housing provision. This would strengthen the Core Strategy and further assert the Council's commitment to contributing to the vitality of rural communities through affordable housing provision.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 776

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 844

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

Representation Summary:

Leave the rural communities as they are

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 908

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 974

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Representation Summary:

Dont believe building on large amounts of Green Belt is reasonable.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 993

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Cllr Tim Sawdon

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1074

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1093

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1154

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Alice Jarrett

Representation Summary:

In words it is identified but in conclustion it appears that the approach is insufficiently positive towards making village development happening.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1176

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Representation Summary:

Support

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1233

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

Representation Summary:

No-
9.14 You cannot expect people not to travel. Unless schools, health, shops, employment are all facilities in each village of course people will have to travel!

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1367

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association

Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants

Representation Summary:

Yes

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1441

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Larraine Curzon

Representation Summary:

In the context of the proposed housing at Warwick Gates - How does the plan fulfil the comment under Rural Communities that 'This preferred option has a positive outcome in terms of economic and social effects, such as increasing prosperity, reducing the need to travel..'

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1512

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Hamilton

Representation Summary:

Support rural pubs.

Use them to provide lunchtime meals for village schools and lunch clubs for the elderly.

Endorse the "pub is the hub" campaign.

Look to give rate incentives for pubs offering wider services such as community meeting rooms, school meals, running a shop/ post office form the premises.

Improve rural transport- investigate creating shared mini bus taxibus routes, introduce post bus services, more frequent bus services.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1548

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs David and Heather Hall

Representation Summary:

A rural communities policy should be flexible to enable schemes to be developed both within and on the edge of rural settlements to enable the villages to be grown to sizes viable to support the services required by their communities.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1564

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: B.L.A.S.T.

Representation Summary:

9a Allotment land provides a sustainable cohesion in rural areas and binds the fabric of the local communities to work together for the common good (as has been the case since feudal times). It is important to maintain the need to keep allotment land available around villages and not let them become expensive housing estates. While at the same time maintaining the rural space between rural and urban communities

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1629

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

Representation Summary:

See comment above re New Town or expansion to otherwise isolated villages with reasonable access to major road systems.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1681

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Representation Summary:

Object.