Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Rural Communities?
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1729
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni
Object
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1786
Received: 20/08/2009
Respondent: Max Bacon
Object.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1816
Received: 28/08/2009
Respondent: Val Hunnisett
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1838
Received: 31/07/2009
Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham
Not enough known about it. Not enough information in the public domain.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1915
Received: 02/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Ed Rycroft
Again the council is making a top-down decision that will effect all the villages. Rural communities should be the ones that decide what is best for them and be impowered to act on those local needs with the the support not the rule from local government...after all the local residents pay your wages so are entitled to the help they decide they need. There are more options than you have put forward.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2052
Received: 04/09/2009
Respondent: mr john jacques
no because it has gone about the currnet study without properly consulting those affected
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2169
Received: 07/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles
More emphasis needs to be placed on the identified need to consult with residents and their elected representatives at local level.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2316
Received: 21/07/2009
Respondent: S B Hoyles
Object.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2392
Received: 04/09/2009
Respondent: Roy Standley
No.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2431
Received: 08/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Connolly
Object.
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2492
Received: 09/09/2009
Respondent: British Waterways
British waterways prefer the options, which would encourage the use, improvement and access to the canal corridor. This includes redevelopment immediately adjacent to the waterway corridor utilising the canal infrastructure to meet Warwick District's development requirements.
Radford Semele, Hatton and Kingswood are close to the Grand Union Canal, North Stratford Canal and South Stratford Canal hence its inclusion within the list.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2555
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson
Number of people: 2
Emphasis should be placed on support, i.e. transport, retail and service needs to underpin existing communities.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2617
Received: 14/09/2009
Respondent: John Arnold
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2678
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt
Yes.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2706
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2740
Received: 09/09/2009
Respondent: Pauline Neale
Villages should be allowed to develop in their own way subject to local consultation and not have new housing / employmen units bolted on to encroach on surrounding countryside.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2791
Received: 14/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield
There should be no development on green field sites at all.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2832
Received: 11/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher
Object.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2871
Received: 11/09/2009
Respondent: Susan Butcher
Object.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2927
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2978
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill
Stopp ripping the heart out of rural villages lives
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3020
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Bill McCutchon
The amount of unnecessary pain this will inflict on the local population with no identifiable gain for them and the loss of the opportunity which should be taken to spread the requirement for housing over a wider area to include the sensible development of rural communities, many of which are finding it difficult to survive as communities witnessed by the closure of schools, local shops, post offices, public houses etc.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3082
Received: 17/09/2000
Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3146
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: John Murphy
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3158
Received: 14/09/2009
Respondent: Mr R.C Hadfield
No Green field sites should be developed before all brown field sites have been fully identified and regenerated.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3224
Received: 20/09/2009
Respondent: mrs stella moore
balance of limited housing development, job creation and support for diversification/affordable housing are all there
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3225
Received: 20/09/2009
Respondent: mrs stella moore
balance between affordable housing/ limited housing growth transport links is all there
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3266
Received: 20/09/2009
Respondent: Mr David John Bowers
People who live in these rural areas because it is
a nice place to live, and take on board that you
need a car, have no local shops. Yes house prices
have risen because of this.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3394
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs M Kane
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3564
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Owen
object