Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Rural Communities?

Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 126

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1729

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Representation Summary:

Object

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1786

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1816

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1838

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Representation Summary:

Not enough known about it. Not enough information in the public domain.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1915

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Ed Rycroft

Representation Summary:

Again the council is making a top-down decision that will effect all the villages. Rural communities should be the ones that decide what is best for them and be impowered to act on those local needs with the the support not the rule from local government...after all the local residents pay your wages so are entitled to the help they decide they need. There are more options than you have put forward.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2052

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: mr john jacques

Representation Summary:

no because it has gone about the currnet study without properly consulting those affected

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2169

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Representation Summary:

More emphasis needs to be placed on the identified need to consult with residents and their elected representatives at local level.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2316

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2392

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

Representation Summary:

No.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2431

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Representation Summary:

Object.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2492

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: British Waterways

Representation Summary:

British waterways prefer the options, which would encourage the use, improvement and access to the canal corridor. This includes redevelopment immediately adjacent to the waterway corridor utilising the canal infrastructure to meet Warwick District's development requirements.
Radford Semele, Hatton and Kingswood are close to the Grand Union Canal, North Stratford Canal and South Stratford Canal hence its inclusion within the list.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2555

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Emphasis should be placed on support, i.e. transport, retail and service needs to underpin existing communities.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2617

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2678

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2706

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2740

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Representation Summary:

Villages should be allowed to develop in their own way subject to local consultation and not have new housing / employmen units bolted on to encroach on surrounding countryside.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2791

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Representation Summary:

There should be no development on green field sites at all.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2832

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2871

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2927

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2978

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Representation Summary:

Stopp ripping the heart out of rural villages lives

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3020

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Bill McCutchon

Representation Summary:

The amount of unnecessary pain this will inflict on the local population with no identifiable gain for them and the loss of the opportunity which should be taken to spread the requirement for housing over a wider area to include the sensible development of rural communities, many of which are finding it difficult to survive as communities witnessed by the closure of schools, local shops, post offices, public houses etc.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3082

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3146

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3158

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.C Hadfield

Representation Summary:

No Green field sites should be developed before all brown field sites have been fully identified and regenerated.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3224

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

Representation Summary:

balance of limited housing development, job creation and support for diversification/affordable housing are all there

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3225

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

Representation Summary:

balance between affordable housing/ limited housing growth transport links is all there

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3266

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

Representation Summary:

People who live in these rural areas because it is
a nice place to live, and take on board that you
need a car, have no local shops. Yes house prices
have risen because of this.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3394

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3564

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

Representation Summary:

object