(iii) Land at Thickthorn, Kenilworth

Object

Representation ID: 3446

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr P Dimanbro

The need to reduce carbon footprints with more locally grown produce. Increasing fuel costs will cause foreign imports to become increasingly expensive.
I also live in Princes Drive, we have traffic jams 3 times a day. The proposed large extra housing and traffic will cause greater congestion and loss of productivity and greater pollution.

Object

Representation ID: 3558

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

object

Object

Representation ID: 3660

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Keay

Inappropriate in this area.

Support

Representation ID: 3690

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Provides opportunity for local employment for Kenilworth

Object

Representation ID: 3835

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R Sambrook

The traffic flow in Birches Lane is already too high. If access to the Leamington Spa is not approved from this development then all the extra traffic will be added to Birches Lane.

Object

Representation ID: 3840

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

Suggestions for the type of employment we should encourage included, high technology industries, service sector jobs, tourism, biotechnology and professional and financial/business services.

There is already enough available land for the above industries. The Ford foundary closed - so the thought of providing land for factories or light industry does not reflect the current situation.
Use up the land you have before assigning any more. I don't believe you should assign ANY MORE large chunks of land. Please inform your advisers that we have moved on since the industrial revolution.

Object

Representation ID: 3921

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs B M Wigram

Thank you for this questionnaire. As I have no information I cannot fill it. However, I think
a) the Thickthorn aree is too confined between the bypass and Glasshouse Lane to be built on, and
b) the impact on Roads/Schools/Shops (with many closing) local jobs (probably none) would be disastrous.
From a clean air/health point of view we must maintain Open Belt areas.
If houses have to be built, is there not an area behind La Reine Gardens available (thereby havinig land between Kenilworth and Coventry)

Object

Representation ID: 3924

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

This land would be better for housing.

Support

Representation ID: 3944

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr John Archer

This site is an appropriate location as part of a balanced packege to meet future employment needs

Object

Representation ID: 3968

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Kim Matthews

This is important green belt land seperating the town from the A46. Road access at the southern part of Kenilwoth is already congested at times and employment in the area would worsen this. Development of this land conflicts directly with the strategic objective on page 75 of the document. The historic tree preservation order covring the area signifies the importance of the trees in the area. This land is ideally suited to be developed into parkland.

Object

Representation ID: 4019

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Major infrastructure implications, resulting in unattractive and possibly congested entry to town.

Support

Representation ID: 4026

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

Support the plan to deveop more emp opportunities in Kenilworth

Object

Representation ID: 4078

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Jerry Woodhouse

This is a housing area - it is totally unsuitable for factories etc. Indeed the infrastructure would not support it.

Support

Representation ID: 4192

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

Due to shortage of employment to the north of the district areas need to be allocated to the Kenilworth, North of Leamington and Warwick areas. These areas have relatively good access to the A46, A45/M45 and the M40. This would maximise use of existing infrastructure & mean less traffic having to go through Leamington & Warwick centres

Support

Representation ID: 4236

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Kulwinder Fathers

No should be Kenilworth, Finham, Baginton Airport, North of Leamington/Warwick areas. This would reduce traffic in town centres and provide good access traffic from/to the A46, A45/M45 and the M40. There are already large areas of employment to the south of the district

Object

Representation ID: 4357

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: A Picken

Not necessary

Object

Representation ID: 4519

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

Location is Green belt

Support

Representation ID: 4583

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Support

Representation ID: 4584

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Object

Representation ID: 4658

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

land at Thickthorn would not be conducive to industrial sites, use existing sites in Kenilworthm there are two or three buidlings half empty in the main Warwick Road suitable for offices!!

Object

Representation ID: 4829

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr. Andrew Clarke

This is a small piece of green belt with a totally unsuitable infrastructure for develpoement.It will destroy the quality of life and value in all the surrounding homes.

Support

Representation ID: 4855

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

It is sensible to spread development around the district

Support

Representation ID: 4877

Received: 07/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

Qualified YES - It is impossible to give a reasoned response withour knowing the infrastructure impllications etc.

Object

Representation ID: 5029

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

Thickthorn introduces the visitor to Kenilworth. It is a pleasant experience that will be immediately destroyed if houses or small factories appear here and Kenilworth will share the fate of many English towns where a drive into the town has all the interest of a drive through an industrial estate.

This green and pleasant area enhances Kenilworth and should remain.

I understand that one of the most pleasant walks in the area, to Rocky Lane, will be surrounded by concrete and brick.
Attractive areas such as this in the south of Kenilworth at a premium to destroy it is unthinkable.

Support

Representation ID: 5117

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

Good access to A46

Object

Representation ID: 5139

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

Vital green space on this side of town, there is little else, road network unable to cope.

Object

Representation ID: 5190

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

NO DO NOT AGREE - Due to Inappropriate use of and building/development on GREEN BELT LAND! - Extensive over development of this area.

Support

Representation ID: 5270

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

Very concerned for mixed use housing and employment as it borders on the busy A46 and is therefore subject to considerable noise day and night. It would seem to be ill-suited to residential.
Noise is less important and easier to control within some commercial and light industrial premises and I would therefore support use of this site for such applications, particularly these which will not result in excessive vehicle movements affecting the existing residential areas to the northwest of the land.

Development would need direct access to the Thickthorn junction on the A46, avoiding any additional traffic on Glasshouse or Birches Lanes.

Support

Representation ID: 5328

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

All communities should provide employment land, but I would only support the reclassification of this site once the other employment land in Kenilworth has been used

Support

Representation ID: 5379

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Support.