(iii) Land at Thickthorn, Kenilworth

Support

Representation ID: 113

Received: 06/07/2009

Respondent: R A Chapleo

Yes - this will allow development in an area of gretest need without the constriction of the Green Belt.

Comment

Representation ID: 164

Received: 07/07/2009

Respondent: mr John Wheatcroft

As long as the employment land is done created in a sympathetic manner, so that it fits in with the surroundings I see no problems. The last thing anyone once is lovely historic buildings with a lump of concrete slapped in the middle. What about converting some old buildings to offices for example

Support

Representation ID: 182

Received: 11/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Alexander Holmes

This option enables development to focus on an area with capacity to meet employment needs, without encroaching on the Green Belt.

Object

Representation ID: 226

Received: 09/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Duncan Hurwood

I do not think expansion is required in Kenilworth, and any such expansion would be highly detrimental to the character of the town, being one step closer to it being swallowed up by Coventry.

Support

Representation ID: 252

Received: 10/07/2009

Respondent: Patricia Robinson

Close to West Midlands where new jobs are needed. Unemployment lower in Warwick/Leamington.

Support

Representation ID: 319

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D Bolam

Development in an area of identified need in terms of employment.

Support

Representation ID: 345

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 423

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

I do not know this area but looking at the map it would not be saturated unlike Harbury Lane.

Support

Representation ID: 474

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Land so near the A46 is better used for offices than homes.

Object

Representation ID: 528

Received: 02/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Stratton

Greenbelt land should be protected. There are numerous brownfield areas that should be developled first

Support

Representation ID: 544

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 596

Received: 03/08/2009

Respondent: B A Alston

Support location

Object

Representation ID: 606

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 655

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Rachel Greasby

This is a residential area there are only houses in and around Thickthorn it would be very out of place an not in keeping with the character of the surroundings

Considerable loss of Green Belt land would erode feel of natural border between Kenilworth and A46
Infrastructure works would have detrimental effects to the character of Kenilworth and its town feeling
Rush hour traffic from Birches lane trying to get onto Leamington / Warwick Road already heavy would not work with extra cars
Leamington road is very busy in rush hour with people coming from A46 and using Kenilworth as short cut

Object

Representation ID: 667

Received: 06/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Susan Edkins

not needed

Support

Representation ID: 697

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 768

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 836

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

No need for more building. A large percentage of business property is currently empty and without the new homes this will not be necessary.

Support

Representation ID: 900

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 953

Received: 22/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Ed Rycroft

Whilst near the A46 it is on Green belt land - this is unacceptable. There is no other industry around there really as most of it is housing...a very ill thougthout strategy probably by people who don't live near there.

Support

Representation ID: 966

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Support

Object

Representation ID: 1062

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Important green corridor. Lovely wood and farmland. If essential, limited use good landscaping. Roads already congested.

Support

Representation ID: 1063

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Good transport links & infrastructure already in place helped by the new Longbridge island junction.

Object

Representation ID: 1168

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Object

Support

Representation ID: 1221

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

Support

Support

Representation ID: 1291

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

Support

Support

Representation ID: 1359

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association

Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants

The authority needs to provide more available employment land.

Support

Representation ID: 1609

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

Limited support only, since any further development in and around Leamington will choke both towns

Support

Representation ID: 1671

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1703

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Will overtly impact on nature, beauty and therefore rural income from tourism.