(iii) Land at Thickthorn, Kenilworth

Support

Representation ID: 1779

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1806

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1825

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Obviously it will take pressure off Warwick.

Support

Representation ID: 1927

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

support

Object

Representation ID: 2041

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: mr john jacques

see 3/a above, and this development will destroy ecology of countryside, choke roads, change th enature of the neighbourhood and conflict with the views of residents.

Object

Representation ID: 2140

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Filling in these green field spaces, decade by decade is creating a huge urban spread from Nuneaton in the north, across 30 miles, to Bishop's Tachbrook in the South.

Object

Representation ID: 2307

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 2386

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

Yes.

Object

Representation ID: 2423

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

traffic is one of the hot spots in this area. Roads are dangerous.

Object

Representation ID: 2525

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Violation of green belt; urbanisation of a rural area, requiring major infrastructural change and increase of traffic density

Object

Representation ID: 2548

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Industrial premises in a much sought after residential location would destroy the attractiveness and desirability of the area.

Comment

Representation ID: 2585

Received: 13/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Clarke

I would support IF:
Access to/from site resticted to A46 island, nothing from Birches Lane or Glasshouse Lane due to the volumes of traffic this would bring. These roads are already a "rat run" and choke up, particularly at the St Johns island at peak times.
Also, building must be low profile and sympathetic to the environment.
Given the difficuties in re-developing the Dalehouse Lane industrial site for business though, is this land really likely to bring employment?

Object

Representation ID: 2594

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Richard Storey

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2610

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2639

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr James Delaney

Kenilworth already developed to its boundaries.
Character of town will be affected by any further development on the proposed scale.
Transport infrastructure inadequate for any increase in the number of vehicles. Road network built for horse and carts, rather than vans and trucks.
Green belt land important to me as a Kenilworth resident. Part of the reason for moving to the areas was the surrounding countryside.
Destruction of green belt inconsistent with Council's commitment to the environment. Likely to have detrimental effect on residents civic pride if green belt destroyed, with corresponding decline in recycling levels, etc.

Support

Representation ID: 2732

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

As in corridor between Kenilworth town and the A46, transport links would be assured. Why, if the current imbalance between jobs and numbers of workers in Kenilworth needs improving, discount development the south of Kenilworth and the North of Milverton. This would help.

Object

Representation ID: 2784

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

I have grave concerns over many of the current proposed Options in the Core Strategy, especially land at Thickthorn.
There is a multitude of wildlife that our house backs onto, and rich green fields and beautiful trees. Do not want to see all this peace and open space disappear.
There will be more traffic chaos in Kenilworth at peak times as more people get to work.

Object

Representation ID: 2817

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Graham A. Reynolds

This is prime farming land which may be lost at a time when food shortages may occur. It is an amenity used by cyclists, joggers, walkers, horse riders that cannot be replaced.

Support

Representation ID: 2924

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

This area contributes well towards spreading the allocations over the wider district and has good access to established infrastructure - a natural choice.

Comment

Representation ID: 2971

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Unknown as we dont know the land.

Object

Representation ID: 3026

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Rhyan Barry

Living locally to this site I know that this is green belt (which obvoiusly means nothing to the council) but besides that I am extremely concerned that when the horse fair is on traffic is brought to a standstill and police are needed to control it so how are the roads going sustain 800+ more cars. Is it going to take me an extra half hour to get to the A46 in the morning?

Support

Representation ID: 3058

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Alison Oliver

Excellent location for motorways and commuters

Support

Representation ID: 3074

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3136

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.C Hadfield

Any further development of housing or light industry would generate an intolerable level of traffic and also destroy the valuable amenities of playing fields and ecology.

Support

Representation ID: 3143

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

This area contributes well towards spreading the allocations over the wider district and has good access to established infrastructure - a natural choice.

Support

Representation ID: 3197

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Robert Burtonshaw

No building on North Leamington Allotments

Object

Representation ID: 3217

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

how can you shoe horn 800 houses and employment opportunities on this limited site

Support

Representation ID: 3258

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

As above 5 (ii)

Support

Representation ID: 3309

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Caroline Martin

Support

Comment

Representation ID: 3385

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

Not sire about this!