Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Representation ID: 69996
Received: 22/04/2016
Respondent: Richard & Janel, Vince & Caroline Hill & McCullagh
Agent: Turley Associates
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Our client supports the Council's acknowledgement that the plan will be reviewed prior to the end of the Plan Period
if a number of events are triggered. In particular our client notes that one of the new criteria for reviewing the Local Plan is "development and growth pressures arising from the specific circumstances in the area to the south of
Coventry (as identified in Policy DS New 1)". However, our part (C) is not sufficiently precise. It should be amended to clarify how "not delivery" is defined. Our client considers that in order to ensure that either a full or partial review of the Plan is not required early in the
Plan Period the Council should allocate sufficient land within the Plan to ensure that the Council can meet both its
own full objectively assessed housing needs and that of other local authorities if demonstrated as necessary.
In order to help achieve this, the Council should remove our client's site from the Green Belt in order that it can be brought forward for development in order to assist the Council in meeting its own housing need and that of other
authorities.
See attached