Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Representation ID: 68566
Received: 22/04/2016
Respondent: Mr JOHN BOILEAU
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Para 2.38 is unacceptably loose and fails to give support to the importance that should be attached to maintaining the Green Belt until all other possibilities have failed. The phrase "non-Green Belt sites are favoured over Green Belt sites where possible" is insufficiently rigorous and does not imply active defence or a desire to protect Green Belt land
Para 2.38 is unacceptably loose and fails to give support to the importance that should be attached to maintaining the Green Belt until all other possibilities have failed. The phrase "non-Green Belt sites are favoured over Green Belt sites where possible" is insufficiently rigorous and does not imply active defence or a desire to protect Green Belt land