Object
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
Representation ID: 62302
Received: 15/01/2014
Respondent: Miss F Coogan
Representation Summary:
The discounting of the other locations seems flawed. Sites 2 and 3 were ruled out because of 'high landscape impact and insufficient vehicle access'. This is ludicrous. Site 1 has higher landscape impact and also has less potential for safe access. The Report used to discount these sites does not appear to truly reflect sites 2 and 3. Site 4 was apparently rejected for 'impact on the main village centre and potential to encourage coalescence of settlements'. This is also incorrect. It would add too many cars to the Southam Road, but that seems to have been ignored.
Full text:
see attached