Support

Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries

Representation ID: 62184

Received: 06/02/2014

Respondent: Mr Nigel Bryan

Representation Summary:

Site 2 should not be developed because:

- It would be much visible and unsightly due to the fact it is on a hill side.
- There would be increased light pollution as a result.
- The development would set a precedent building close to the canal and damaging all the eco system.
- It would encourage children to cross the buy A4177 road leading to inevitable accidents and potential death

Full text:

I would like to register my objection to the proposed development at Hatton Park for the following reasons:

1. The Road Infrastructure limitations

- The A4177 from Hatton Park to Warwick is already extremely busy and gets regularly congested on week days during rush hours. On a standard day traffic is heavy and slow but it only have to take road works in Warwick or some form of accident, and the road is gridlocked. Building additional homes on the Hatton Park site would only add to this burden.
- The above point is exasparated if you consider the additional homes proposed for Budbrooke - the cars from these homes will all filter onto the A4177 by the A46 junction and cause even more chaos

2. Facilities

- We have young children and will soon be thinking about schools - the schools around the area are already full so bringing even more families into the area does not make sense.

3. The discounted options (site 2) is I understand, also being considered. This site should not be developed because

- it would be much visible and unsightly due to the fact is is on a hill side
- there would increased light pollution as a result
- the development would set a precedent building close to the canal and damaging all the eco system.
- it would encourage children to cross the buy A4177 road leading to inevitable accidents and potential death

I trust these objections will be considered and the proposal to develop at Hatton Park discounted