Object
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
Representation ID: 62103
Received: 17/01/2014
Respondent: Mr Martin Spendley
Representation Summary:
-Radford Semele's other appeal is that it is physically separate from Leamington and therefore Site 4 is not suitable for additional housing.
-Site 2 and 3 are the least objectionable of the proposed sites. I see no reason for all the new development to be lumped together on one site- two or more sites would be more acceptable.
-Furthermore, developments towards Southam would allow the installation of new services (water, sewerage, gas and electricity) which could support further growth of the area in later years and solve potential traffic problems.
Full text:
see attached