Object
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
Representation ID: 62079
Received: 20/01/2014
Respondent: Mr Andrew Jones
Representation Summary:
-Sites 3 and 4 at Radford Semele have been rejected by WDC and the reasons put forward are not convincing.
-Access/visual impact issues are the same for Site 2 as Site 3 and WDC reasons for rejection are not valid. A traffic report shows that access can be achieved at Site 3. As for visual impact, the WDC assessment is invalid because it relates to a huge area of land and not this site specifically.
-Site 4 has been said to cause the merging of Radford Semele and Leamington. The site merely 'rounds off' the village boundary.
Full text:
see attached