> As a resident of Bishops
Tachbrook I feel I must object to the latest develoment that has reared its ugly
> head.Our village is in danger of losing its identity completely if
all the proposed developments are allowed to
> proceed,the site at
Woodside farm has already been given the go ahead,Tachbrook village itself is under threat
> of two seperate developments (both in Holt Avenue)one being
the :prefered option: of WDC and the other by the
> developers Barwood.
Both of these developments are for 120 houses even though the local survey said we needed
> 20!Speaking to a local councillor I asked why the Woodside
develoment was not taken into account for Tachbrooks
> quota of housing,
taking into account Tachbrook,Woodside and Harbury lane this could result in a mind bogling
> 740 houses!If a country park style park were to be added to
the Harbury Lane site it Would in effect be joined
> to Tachbrook,a village
<a group of houses Within the country side>.Although a new primary school is "proposed"
> where are the older children going to school and the younger
ones to nursery?where are the doctors surgeries
> all local ones are
bursting at the seams Warwick Hospital has no intention of expanding,740 houses could result
> in 1500 extra cars on what are basically country lanes.The
m40 is seen as the ultimate destination but cars
> must reach it first and
Tachbrook will be used as a rat run.When Warwick Gates was built Tachbrook was without
> water for part of the day if building of this scale goes ahead we
could have non.This ammount of housing is
> not sustainable in one area it
must be shared by the whole area not just south leamington.