Support
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
Representation ID: 61252
Received: 20/01/2014
Respondent: Mrs Laura Teodorczyk
Hatton Park is NOT suitable for further development, but if the Preferred Option occurs the Settlement Boundary must be drawn tightly to the existing development as shown (to be adjusted in the case of part-development of the Preferred Option site).
In any scenario the Settlement Boundary on the northern and western edges should be drawn as shown because of that land's high amenity value with views across the Green Belt to and from Hatton Park.
Please refer to my other detailed representations that Hatton Park is NOT suitable for further development and that I do not support any development sites.
IF the Preferred Option is to be imposed, I agree that the Settlement Boundary must be drawn tightly to the existing development to protect the remainder of the undeveloped Greenfield land within the Green Belt.
In any scenario the Settlement Boundary to the north and west of Hatton Park should be drawn as shown because of its high amenity value as Green Belt. The height rise from the canal and A4177 means that land to the north of Barcheston Drive is highly visible with views across the Green Belt to and from Hatton Park.