Object
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
Representation ID: 61231
Received: 20/01/2014
Respondent: Mrs Jill Coombs
Evaluation of Option1) is inadequate. It fails to consider all relevant factors, including WDC's criteria. The options should be re-considered based on detailed evaluation attached
Analysis of NPPF criteria shows Radford shouldn't have been considered for such a large influx development.
Matrix site comparison analysis shows WDC should target two sites for development rather than one large site. The two sites would have a smaller density of 40 to 60 houses each, to reduce the high impact found in the 4 single sites. Using two sites more equitably shares the Local impact across the village applying Social responsibility and Sustainability principles.
Evaluation of Option1) is inadequate. It fails to consider all relevant factors, including WDC's criteria. The options should be re-considered based on detailed evaluation attached
Analysis of NPPF criteria shows Radford shouldn't have been considered for such a large influx development.
Matrix site comparison analysis shows WDC should target two sites for development rather than one large site. The two sites would have a smaller density of 40 to 60 houses each, to reduce the high impact found in the 4 single sites. Using two sites more equitably shares the Local impact across the village applying Social responsibility and Sustainability principles.