I object to the addition of new homes on the proposed Site 1 because it would cause more traffic leaving the estate in the mornings.

In my view Site 2 by the canal is more suitable given that a new roundabout about is proposed. Additionally, Site 2 would accommodate the number of houses proposed whereas Site 1 is larger which will mean further development can be undertaken.

However, whichever site is given permission I want to know how the council intend to deal with the extra school places which will be needed and the resultant stretch on the existing ailing infrastructure. Or, will these new houses only be available to childless people without cars?