Support
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
Representation ID: 60930
Received: 16/01/2014
Respondent: Sworders
We are supportive of the decision to exclude the alternative sites and agree with the findings of the site assessment matrix contained at appendix 6 in relation to these discounted sites.
Development of Site 2 would be inappropriate due to contamination and potential environmental buffer designation. Site 3 is unsuitable due to quarry / geological importance, potential contamination and landscape impact. Site 4 is justifiably discounted due to flood risk and current viable commercial use. Discounted option 5 has high landscape value as well as potential impact on impact on the conservation area and scheduled ancient monument.
We are supportive of the decision to exclude the alternative sites and agree with the findings of the site assessment matrix contained at appendix 6 in relation to these discounted sites.
Development of Site 2 would be inappropriate due to contamination and potential environmental buffer designation. Site 3 is unsuitable due to quarry / geological importance, potential contamination and landscape impact. Site 4 is justifiably discounted due to flood risk and current viable commercial use. Discounted option 5 has high landscape value as well as potential impact on impact on the conservation area and scheduled ancient monument.