I broadly support the proposals but have other suggestions. I support 1 ,2 and 4. I object to 3. 3 is really a tennis court and should be returned to that use for the benefit of the village. The land between 1 and 4 should be included for development,as propsed by the Police some time ago. This area could accomodate 40 dwellings. This is a natural site with 1. There is then no need for 5 or 3. I am sure that arguments will arise about the junction between Woodcote Lane and Warwick Road. This is easily answered by traffic lights or a mini roundabout . This would have the added bonus of slowing traffic down. If the police object to traffic lights it cannot be beyond the wit of man to create a discreet hand held remote control for the police in an emergency. I hope this helps inform decision making.